In multiple “ho hum” decisions, children in Judge Dale Wells court room, are viewed as disposable property. In this example the initial custody recommendation specified joint custody with primary custody to the mother. Judge Wells repeatedly and merely on a whim decided to change an initial custody recommendation, by interchanging and scribbling in the word father and mother.
There is no best interest of the child standard adhered to in this scenario. Judge Wells decides to play God. The pattern is that Judge Wells grants custody to fathers on a whim.
In this specific case, a 4 year old boy was living with his mother who was the primary care taker; the mediator recommended that she be left as the primary care taker and Judge Wells plays “God” ordering that a child be moved to a different county, in a different location without examining the repercussions of a move away. Yes that is right folks, Judge Wells plays God with the lives of children committing the ultimate blasphemy.
However, Judge Wells has already made his state of mind and the recognition of the sin that he commits clear in his own words:
“Romans 7:21-25 So I find this law at work: When I want to do good, evil is right there with me. For in my inner being I delight in Gods law; but I see another law at work in the members of my body, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of the law of sin at work within my members. What a wretched man I am! Who will rescue me from this body of death? Thanks be to God—through Jesus Christ our Lord!” http://www.slideshare.net/pdcoc92255/111023-the-big-ten-12-making-the-big-ten-personal