Most of the litigants that have been exposed to the ten year reign of terror in the Riverside Superior Court are familiar with the absolute insanity of Judge Dale Wells’ rulings that mandate an immediate psychiatric evaluation by the Judicial Council, to determine fitness to act in a judicial capacity. The evidence quite apparently demonstrates that his belief rulings are not based upon the existing law and statute. The malicious persecution of certain litigants confirms that Judge Wells uses the law to retaliate in a vicious case of legal rape and battery.
Some litigants are baffled how one judicial officer has been allowed to run rampant for ten years with no oversight or accountability and what makes such an individual “tick”.
According to Judge Wells’ own statements documented in a Riverside Bar Association interview conducted in 2004 he turned to law, when his first wife left him and he came home finding his house cleaned out. Considering the fact that there was a community of property marriage, half of the possessions belonged to his wife. The question also arises as to why somebody would run rather than ask for a divorce.
Judge Wells belief as a preacher is that there should be no divorce as he belongs to a group where divorce is not an option. That does not explain why he has been married several times according to public records, demonstrating an incapability of dealing with one relationship. Considering the fact that Judge Wells does not believe in divorce it strongly suggests that all prior wives left him rather quickly. Judge Wells in the interview stated that he is prevented from acting as a preacher as the group that he belongs to does not believe in divorce. Yet, strangely this has not prevented him from preaching every Sunday at a church as a preacher, continuing with his first profession, once again demonstrating a contradiction in his core belief.
It is apparent from Judge Wells’ behavior on the bench that he is using the law as he wants to get back at all the bitches that dared to leave him. His misogynistic behavior is demonstrated time and time again, including his out of control reactions to certain litigants who insists that he adhere to the actual law and who object to his blatant attempt at subjugation.