In the never ending saga of the “game” of a kangeroo court who invents rules and procedures not governed by statute a litigant who was declared vexatious but is now represented by an attorney presented a family law motion for filing to the Riverside Superior Court. The clerk of the court and her supervisor refused to file it, stating that the attorney who is representing the parent is acting as a puppet for the vexatious litigant and that the MC 701 form needs to be accompany the filing. CCP section 391 specifically references in pro per, as does the MC 701 form and if you are represented by an attorney the MC 701 form does not apply. BUT the clerk of the court and her supervisor would not file the presented litigation in violation of California rules of court 1.20.a and in the process intends to defame, libel and slander the attorney as vexatious as well.
A day later, the supervisor apologized to the parent for her actions, and filed the motion but that does not compensate the parent for the time, frustration and outrageous remarks that have to be dealt with.