The evaluator did not comply with CA rules of court 5.220 in conducting the evaluation.11%
The evaluator was not objective 22%.
The evaluator added statements that were never made in their evaluation.11%
The evaluator pressured the children to state a custodial preference. 11%
The evaluator misrepresented official reports that were provided to the evaluator and did not attach them to the evaluation. 13%
The evaluation was skewed in favor of the parent who paid for the report. 22%
Please add your vote and opinion. Other polls have been created to evaluate your experience with the court including the Court of appeal. All votes and comments are kept confidential. https://viewsandnewsriversidesuperiourcourt.wordpress.com/2014/04/08/satisfaction-poll-4th-district-court-of-appeal/