UPDATE: Reply brief filed in federal appeal. Arch Cunningham files preliminary injunction requesting a stay in the application of the VLS statute in family law in the State of California.

Appellant reply brief filed in federal vexatious litigant appeal. http://www.scribd.com/doc/218679201/A-17170-Reply-Filed

News and Views Riverside Superior Court and San Bernardino Superior Court; National Family Law Abuse

Arch Cunningham, the attorney representing the class of parents who were stigmatized as vexatious, has filed his opening brief with the Ninth District Circuit Court of Appeal and has filed a preliminary injunction requesting a stay on the VLS application in family law state wide in the State of California.  The brief specifically addresses the unconstitutionality of the vexatious litigant application in family law and how parents have been maliciously harmed by not having the first and fourteenth substantive and procedural due process right to seek redress from terminating custody orders.  The brief and the injunction in its entirety can be accessed here.



Any parent who has been stigmatized as vexatious is prevented from accessing  a court of law, thus in effect their parental rights have been terminated.

The judicial council has also implemented vexatious litigant recommendations and forms which have no basis in family law, as they…

View original post 721 more words


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s