It appears that Judge Wells has a vendetta against puppies. There is a case in his court room where the father allegedly promised his 5 year old daughter a puppy and took her out of school. Mind you it appears at the time that the father had 50/50 custody.
So the mother’s attorney decided to file an exparte claiming that the father “stole the child” for promising his 5 year old daughter a puppy and taking her out of school. Now Judge Wells routinely as everyone knows denies expartes, as to him there is no emergency unless there is “blood on the floor”.
In this case he actually decided to grant THE Puppy exparte and issued a temporary sanctions order granting the mother sole legal and sole physical custody because of a PUPPY.
Now if the father had indeed violated any court order, which is highly debatable considering Judge Wells interpretation of the…
View original post 189 more words