How to obtain custody in the Riverside Superior Court

All it takes folks is one refrain: “she’s DELUSIONAL, she’s  a FOREIGNER, she’s DELUSIONAL, she’s  a FOREIGNER, she’s DELUSIONAL, she’s  a FOREIGNER, she’s DELUSIONAL, she’s  a FOREIGNER, she’s DELUSIONAL; interspersed with “YOU WORTHLESS DELUSIONAL PIECE OF SHIT”; she’s  a FOREIGNER, she’s DELUSIONAL, she’s  a FOREIGNER, she’s DELUSIONAL, she’s  a FOREIGNER, she’s DELUSIONAL, she’s  a FOREIGNER, she’s DELUSIONAL, she’s  a FOREIGNER, she’s DELUSIONAL, she’s  a FOREIGNER, she’s DELUSIONAL, she’s  a FOREIGNER, she’s DELUSIONAL, she’s  a FOREIGNER.

Evidence is presented of alcoholism not only by testimony of a parent, but testimony of witnesses who witnessed the “habit” in front of children. The “evidence” that prevails is “she’s DELUSIONAL, she’s  a FOREIGNER”.

Evidence of abuse towards the other parent is presented not only by the other parent but witnesses who heard the abuse. The “evidence” that prevails is  “she’s DELUSIONAL, she’s  a FOREIGNER”.

Evidence of a loving caring and fit parent with a loving relationship to children was presented to the court, not only by testimony but the other parent’s own admissions and the testimony of witnesses. The “evidence” that prevails is she’s DELUSIONAL, she’s  a FOREIGNER”.

 The court views the parent’s activities that involve, a science museum, library, sports and church as a “concern”, as the refrain “she’s DELUSIONAL, she’s  a FOREIGNER” MUST prevail at all cost. No such concern was of course expressed for rampant alcoholism, possession of an unregistered gun and rampant abuse. 

This is the current status quo in custody cases in the Riverside Superior Court where the refrain “she’s DELUSIONAL, she’s  a FOREIGNER”  appears in the entire custody case and outweighs any law, any family code statute, or the 14th amendment right to a PROTECTED child relationship and the minimum REQUIRED substantive and procedural due process mandated by the statute for any proceeding. THIS is ALL it takes to obtain custody in this court.

Having achieved the purpose of these actions which was to DEFLECT from what this parent is actually doing to the other parent and the children in this case this is the VICTORY statement of said parent: ” I HAVE CUSTODY,CARE AND CONTROL OF THE CHILDREN…. you have NOTHING….. other than your DELUSIONS”.

Now from the reaction of some judicial officers who actually blame the victim in this case as the refrain parent is merely “frustrated” one would assume that the concept described above must be completely unknown. The reality is that domestic violence and its repercussions are well known throughout society and are viewed as a public health risk in particular when it involves children. The National Clearinghouse on Family Violence, Family Violence Prevention Unit, a Public Health Agency of Canada, has published the pervasive impact on children who witness their mother being abused. http://www.lfcc.on.ca/little_eyes_little_ears.pdf Any parent experiencing the repercussions of such abuse knows where it is coming from and that the children are certainly not to blame. They merely mirror the insane actions that they have been taught.

Dr. Daniel Saunders, in a well known study in conjunction with the Department of Justice evaluated the “patriarchal belief” and attitude of the court towards the domestic violence victim, confirming unequivocally that the Court fails to protect, http://archive.ssw.umich.edu/about/profiles/saunddan/Custody-Evaluators-Beliefs-About-Domestic-Abuse-Allegations-Final-Tech-Report-to-NIJ-10-31-11.pdf

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s