Personal Vendetta of the Fourth District Court of Appeal Division 2: We do what we want, what we really, really want.

ISOLATEDISLAND2

 

 

In response to the Motion to reinstate an appeal  posted here https://viewsandnewsriversidesuperiourcourt.wordpress.com/2014/07/09/modus-operandi-of-the-court-of-appeal-fourth-district-division-2-equal-protection-be-damned/ the court of appeal sent the motion backing citing “lack of cause”.

RAMIREDENIAL2

 

The court of appeal is retaliating against a litigant as CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT are very clear. According to  California rules of court 8.20  California Rules of Court prevail and a ” Court of Appeal must accept for filing a record, brief, or other document that complies with the California Rules of Court despite any local rule imposing other requirements.”

The court’s dismissal of the appeal is an involuntarily dismissal of the appeal as such California rules of court 8.264 (b) apply to the appeal  which specifies that the involuntary dismissal is only final after thirty days.
The court cannot invent rules and non existing procedures to uphold an unlawful denial of an appeal  based on the court’s mistakes and personal vindictive retaliation against a litigant, based on a non existent cause that it has invented and created.
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s