A list of the unpublished decisions from all six appellate districts is included below.
|Date Posted||Docket #/
|Description||When filed||Case Type||Decision||Appellant self represented||Justice drafting opinion|
|08/04/14||H041016||H.C. v. Super. Ct. CA6 filed 8/4/14 Case Details||05/16/14||juvenile||writ petition denied||yes||BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN|
|08/04/14||E057487||Falbo v. Board of Administration CA4/2 filed 8/4/14 Case Details||11/05/12||civil||affirm||no||Richli|
|08/04/14||B242788||filed: 8/4/14 In re Marriage of Chan CA2/8 Filed 8/4/14 Case Details||07/20/12||civil family law||affirm||no||Bigelow|
|08/04/14||A142051||J.C. v. Super. Ct. CA1/1 filed 8/4/14 Case Details||06/05/14||juvenile||writ petition denied||no||Banke|
|08/04/14||A139376||Conservatorship of Gums CA1/3 filed 8/4/14 Case Details||07/29/13||civil probate||affirm||no||Siggins|
|08/04/14||A138744||Hahn v. Dibble CA1/1 filed 8/4/14 Case Details||05/23/13||civil||dismissed||yes||Becton|
|08/04/14||A135489||P. v. Meyers CA1/3 filed 8/04/14 Case Details||05/14/12||cr||affirm||no||Jenkins, Pollak dissenting|
|08/04/14||E061318||Love v. Super. Ct. CA4/2 filed 8/4/14 Case Details||06/12/14||cr||Writ petition granted to issue certificate of probable cause||no||King|
|08/04/14||E060307||In re J.T. CA4/2 filed 8/4/14 Case Details||12/26/13||juvenile||affirm||no||Codrington|
|08/04/14||E059216||P. v. Michael M. CA4/2 filed 8/4/14 Case Details||no docket||cr||affirm||no||Ramirez|
|08/04/14||E058870||P. v. Dill CA4/2 filed 8/4/14 Case Details||05/24/13||cr||affirm||no||McKinster|
|08/04/14||E058557||P. v. Acevedo CA4/2 filed 8/4/14 Case Details||04/15/13||cr||We will reverse the order granting defendant’s petition for a recall of his life
sentence and for resentencing as a second strike offender under the Reform Act, and
remand the matter to allow the trial court to conduct an adequate inquiry of the trial
record to determine whether defendant was physically armed with the firearm
|08/04/14||E058162||P. v. Rodriguez-Lopez CA4/2 filed 8/4/14 Case Details||02/21/13||cr||Condition No. 31 of defendant’s San Bernardino County Probation
Department report, filed February 13, 2013—that he must “Not remain in, or reenter,
the United States without proper written authorization by the Department of Homeland
Security—Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services. [¶] Upon reentering the
United States, report forthwith to the probation officer with written proof of said
authorization”— is ordered stricken. The judgment is otherwise affirmed.
|08/04/14||D065767||In re Mason P. CA4/1 filed 8/4/14 Case Details||04/10/14||juvenile||affirm||no||Nares|
|08/04/14||B253023||P. v. Delgado CA2/5 filed 8/4/14 Case Details||12/04/13||cr wende appeal||affirm||no||Mink|
|08/04/14||B251907||P. v. Gonzalez CA2/5 filed 8/4/14 Case Details||09/23/13||cr wende appeal||affirm||no||Mink|
|08/04/14||B250547||In re Peter K. CA2/2 filed 8/4/14 Case Details||08/09/13||juvenile delinquent||affirm||no||Boren|
|08/04/14||B248970||Azar v. Escher CA2/2 filed 8/4/14 Case Details||05/24/13||civil||reversed||no||Boren|
|08/04/14||B247857||P. v. Corelleone CA2/2 filed 8/4/14 Case Details||03/11/13||cr||affirm||no||Boren|
|08/04/14||B247076||P. v. Kennedy CA2/2 filed 8/4/14 Case Details||02/21/13||cr||affirm||no||Boren|
|08/04/14||B246716||1st Amer. Warehouse Mortgage v. Topa Ins. Co. CA2/4 filed 8/4/14 Case Details||01/28/13||civil||affirm||yes||Edmon|
|08/04/14||A139229||P. v. Scott CA1/5 filed 8/4/14 Case Details||06/27/13||cr||affirm||no||Jones|
|08/01/14||E060838||P. v. Reed CA4/2 filed 8/1/14 Case Details||03/25/14||cr wende appeal||affirm||no||Richli|
|08/01/14||H039846||In re C.A. CA6 filed 8/1/14 Case Details||06/25/13||juvenile delinquent||The dispositional order is reversed. The case is remanded for the juvenile court to
characterize the offense as a felony or misdemeanor and to allow the juvenile court to
modify the no-contact probation condition to specify that Carlos not knowingly have
contact with Adrian R.
|no||Grover, Mihara dissenting|
|08/01/14||E060331||P. v. Cruz CA4/2 filed 8/1/14 Case Details||01/06/14||cr wende appeal possible issues presented||affirm||no||Richli|
|08/01/14||E059960||In re E.D. CA4/2 filed 8/1/14 Case Details||10/31/13||juvenile||affirm||no||Richli|
|08/01/14||E057558||P. v. Barahona CA4/2 filed 8/1/14 Case Details||11/19/12||cr||The parole revocation fine imposed under section 1202.45 is stricken. The trial
court is directed to modify the abstract of judgment accordingly and forward a copy of
the modified abstract of judgment to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.
In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.
|08/01/14||B253266||Marble v. Fibiger CA2/5 filed 8/1/14 Case Details||12/12/13||civil probate||The December 2, 2013 judgment is affirmed as to the survivorship clause issue.
The judgment is reversed as to: defendant being liable for financial abuse of a dependent
adult under Welfare and Institutions Code section 15610.30, subdivision (a)(3); the order
defendant pay attorney’s fees, costs, and punitive damages under Welfare and Institutions
Code section 15657.5; and the order defendant pay double damages and attorney’s fees
and costs under Probate Code section 859.
|08/01/14||A137609||Cal-Murphy LLC v. Hines Interests Limited Partnership CA1/5 filed 8/1/14 Case Details||01/09/13||civil||The orders appealed from in A137609 are affirmed.
The order appealed from in A139772 is modified by replacing the last sentence
with the following: “All Plaintiffs are jointly and severally liable for $186,922.25 of this
amount; Cal-Murphy is solely responsible for the remaining $3,089.75.” The corrected
and second amended judgment on claims of individual plaintiffs Shihadeh and Omran,
also appealed from in A139772, is modified by replacing paragraph 3 with the following:
“A Corrected and Second Amended Judgment be entered in favor of NOP and against the 15
Individual Plaintiffs in the additional amount of $1,623,922.25.” As so modified, the
order and judgment appealed from in A139772 are affirmed.
|08/01/14||F068724||In re Brooke G. CA5 filed 8/1/14 Case Details||01/21/14||juvenile||affirm||no||Gomes|
|08/01/14||E060277||In re J.H. CA4/2 filed 8/1/14 Case Details||12/23/13||juvenile||affirm||no||Ramirez|
|08/01/14||E059026||P. v. Crawford CA4/2 filed 8/1/14 Case Details||06/26/13||cr||The probation conditions are modified as follows: The unnumbered probation
term that requires defendant to “comply with any court-ordered payment schedule”
(capitalization altered) is deleted. As thus modified, the judgment is affirmed.
|08/01/14||E057957||P. v. Washington CA4/2 filed 8/1/14 Case Details||01/16/13||cr||affirmed, remanded for resentencing||no||Ramirez|
|08/01/14||E055956||Rivera v. Co. of Riverside CA4/2 filed 8/1/14 Case Details||03/22/12||civil||The order granting Rivera’s motion for attorney fees is reversed. Each party shall
bear their respective costs on appeal.
|08/01/14||G049804||P. v. Rodriguez and Lopez CA4/3 filed 8/1/14 Case Details||09/21/12||cr||We modify and correct the judgment (§ 1260) by striking Lopez’s and
Rodriguez’s petty theft convictions and by entering a stay under section 654 on
defendants’ carjacking and robbery convictions and enhancements, and we remand the
matter for the trial court to amend its restitution order to reflect Rodriguez and Lopez
must pay $21,473.26 in funeral expenses to Ochoa’s relatives rather than the Wilshire
Insurance Company. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.
|08/01/14||D065230||P. v. Thornton CA4/1 filed 8/1/14 Case Details||12/19/13||cr wende appeal||affirm||no||Huffman|
|08/01/14||B252623||In re J.S. CA2/8 filed 8/1/14 Case Details||11/01/13||juvenile||That part of the jurisdictional order that is based on mother’s conduct is reversed.
The disposition order is vacated, and the matter is remanded for the juvenile court to
issue a new disposition order consistent with this opinion. In all other respects the
juvenile court’s orders are affirmed.
|no||Flier, Grimes dissenting|
|08/01/14||B251838||P. v. Haney CA2/5 filed 8/1/14 Case Details||10/02/13||cr||dismissed||no||Turner|
|08/01/14||B248669||P. v. Prather CA2/4 filed 8/1/14 Case Details||05/10/13||cr||The trial court is directed to correct the abstract of judgment by ordering the
sentence as to count 2 stayed pursuant to Penal Code section 654, and the clerk is
directed to forward the amended abstract of judgment to the Department of Corrections
and Rehabilitation. As modified, the judgment is affirmed.
|08/01/14||E056173||Conservatorship of Sanchez CA4/2 filed 8/1/14 Case Details||04/23/12||civil probate||affirm||no||Miller|
|08/01/14||C075374||P. v. Webb CA3 filed 8/1/14 Case Details||04/23/12||cr wende appeal||affirm||no||Hull|
|08/01/14||C075336||In re Jayden M. CA3 filed 8/1/14 Case Details||12/05/13||juvenile||affirm||no [“[T]he court’s focus at a section 366.26 hearing is not upon who will adopt a dependent child but rather whether the child is likely to be adopted if rights are terminated. (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1).)”].) Adoptability is determined by looking at the minor’s characteristics, not the characteristics of the potential adoptive placement. (Id. at pp. 1311-1312; see also § 366.26, subd. (c)(1) [specific adoptive placement not prerequisite to adoptability finding].) Thus, the Department’s assessment of the suitability of the maternal and paternal grandmothers for placement was irrelevant to the juvenile court’s finding that 12 Jayden is generally adoptable.||Hull|
|08/01/14||C075271||P. v. Emerson CA3 filed 8/1/14 Case Details||11/22/13||cr||affirm||no||Mauro|
|08/01/14||C074832||P. v. Ryan CA3 filed 8/1/14 Case Details||09/20/13||cr wende appeal||affirm||no||Hull|
|08/01/14||C074813||P. v. Garcia CA3 filed 8/1/14 Case Details||09/09/13||cr wende appeal||affirm||no||Hull|
|08/01/14||H037038||Bechtold v. Gillespie CA6 filed 7/30/14 Case Details||06/20/11||civil||appeal dismissed as moot||no||Elia|
|08/01/14||D064109||P. v. Mucetti CA4/1 filed 8/1/14 Case Details||06/20/13||cr||affirm||no||Huffman|
|08/01/14||C070991||P. v. Burke CA3 filed 8/1/14 Case Details||04/23/12||cr||affirm||no||Hull|
|08/01/14||A141128||In re B.Z. CA1/1 filed 7/31/14 Case Details||02/21/14||juvenile delinquent wende appeal||affirm||no||Margulies|