According to the Judicial Council perjury is OK when they’re conducting it

Judicial Council Watcher

It’s just one of those double standards we apparently must live with, though I would think it entirely fair that a federal grand jury look into the obvious evidence that judicial council staff and their attorneys committed perjury in depositions and filings with the federal courts. After all, a federal grand jury would have jurisdiction over such matters because they happened in the federal courts.

Sure, some people have suggested that a federal grand jury could indict a ham sandwich but I think it’s about time to start indicting some ham sandwiches and stripping some pensions away from those who were involved. Additionally, those who have financially benefited from committing perjury, namely the agency that never existed, should be ordered to return all money that resulted from a tainted summary judgement. 

If you get a chance, please pen a letter to U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag courtesy of the U.S. Attorneys…

View original post 314 more words


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s