CA Court of Appeal Stats 8/19/2014

A list of the unpublished decisions from all six appellate districts is included below.

Date Posted Docket #/

File Format

Description Date initiated Type of case Decision Appellant Self represented Judge issuing opinion.
08/19/14 G048408

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Romero CA4/3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 05/08/13 cr affirm no Thompson
08/19/14 G047358

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Vargas CA4/3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 08/31/12 cr affirm no Ikola
08/19/14 F066694

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Eshaya CA5 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 02/14/13 cr The sentence imposed on count II is ordered stayed. The clerk of the court is
directed to prepare an amended abstract of judgment and forward it to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.
no PEÑA,
08/19/14 E060557

[PDF] [DOC]

P.B. v. Superior Court CA4/2 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 02/10/14 juvenile writ petition affirm no Richli
08/19/14 E058567

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Constant CA4/2 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 04/15/13   affirm no Richli
08/19/14 G048445

[PDF] [DOC]

Harper v. Canyon Hills Community Assn. CA4/3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 05/08/13 civil The judgment in favor of respondents David and Patricia Valentine is
affirmed and they shall recover their costs on appeal. The judgment in favor of respondent Canyon Hills is reversed and that matter is remanded to the superior court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. Appellant shall recover her costs on appeal related to the judgment for respondent Canyon Hills.
no Rylaarsdam
08/19/14 F067110

[PDF] [DOC]

Smeed v. Galtar, LLC CA5 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 04/04/13 civil The judgment is reversed and the matter remanded with directions to strike from
the judgment the award of attorney fees as costs and to reconsider and determine the
amount of compensatory and punitive damages to be awarded in light of our
determination that the breach of contract cause of action was not maliciously prosecuted.

The parties shall bear their own attorney fees and costs on appeal.

no Hill
08/19/14 F065631

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Simmons CA5 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 08/24/12 cr affirm no PEÑA, J.
08/19/14 E060865

[PDF] [DOC]

In re E.G. CA4/2 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 03/25/14 juvenile affirm no Codrington
08/19/14 E060637

[PDF] [DOC]

In re M.T. CA4/2 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 02/18/14 juvenile The February 13, 2014, orders terminating mother’s parental rights and freeing M.T. for adoption are conditionally reversed and a limited remand is ordered as follows. Upon remand, the court shall direct DPSS to send ICWA notices in accordance with the ICWA and California law. DPSS shall thereafter file certified mail return receipts for the
ICWA notice, together with any responses received. If no responses are received, DPSS 
shall so inform the court. The court shall determine whether the ICWA noticing has been
completed and whether M.T. is an Indian child. If the court finds M.T. is not an Indian
child, it shall reinstate the orders terminating parental rights and freeing M.T. for
adoption. If the court finds M.T. is an Indian child, it shall conduct all further proceedings in compliance with the ICWA and related law.
no Ramirez
08/19/14 E060590

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Dawson CA4/2 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 02/05/14 cr wende appeal affirm no Hollenhurst
08/19/14 E060231

[PDF] [DOC]

In re J.E. CA4/2 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 12/18/13 juvenile delinquent wende appeal affirm no Hollenhurst
08/19/14 E059717

[PDF] [DOC]

In re K.R. CA4/2 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 09/27/13 juvenile affirm no Ramirez
08/19/14 E059539

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Smith CA4/2 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 08/19/13 cr affirm no Ramirez
08/19/14 E058109

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Delgado CA4/2 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 02/14/13 cr affirm no King
08/19/14 B245446

[PDF] [DOC]

Boggs v. Franchise Tax Bd. CA2/5 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 11/19/12 civil The order denying the motion for class certification is affirmed. The Board is
awarded its costs on appeal.
no Mosk
08/19/14 A140267

[PDF] [DOC]

In re A.B. CA1/3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 11/13/13 juvenile In case no. A140267, the August 26, 2013, order is reversed. In case No.
A140583, let a peremptory writ of mandate issue directing respondent court to vacate so
much of its January 13, 2014, order as found mother was offered or provided reasonable
services, terminated reunification services, and set a section 366.26 permanency hearing. On remand the juvenile court is directed to conduct further proceedings consistent with this opinion. The stay issued by this court shall automatically dissolve on the issuance of the remittitur.
no Jenkins
08/19/14 A138408

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Campbell CA1/1 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 04/15/13 cr The trial court is directed to prepare a corrected abstract of judgment awarding defendant two days of local conduct credit under section 4019 in addition to the two days for actual time in local custody, and to forward a certified copy of the corrected abstract of judgment to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. no Becton
08/19/14 A135565

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Porter CA1/1 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 05/11/12 cr affirm no Becton
08/19/14 E060614

[PDF] [DOC]

In re E.C. CA4/2 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 01/06/14 juvenile affirm no Richli
08/19/14 E060591

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. James CA4/2 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 02/05/14 cr The order denying defendant’s petition to recall his three strikes sentence is Affirmed no McKinster
08/19/14 C075696

[PDF] [DOC]

In re L.B. CA3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 01/30/14 juvenile appeal dismissed as nonjusticiable. no Hull
08/19/14 C072675

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Woloszyn CA3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 11/14/12 cr affirm no Nicholson
08/19/14 B255305

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Martinez CA2/1 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 03/27/14 cr wende appeal affirm no Rothshild
08/19/14 B253175

[PDF] [DOC]

In re T.M. CA2/8 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 12/09/13 juvenile The order terminating parental rights is conditionally reversed, and the matter is remanded to the juvenile court with directions to order compliance with the notice provisions of the ICWA in accordance with this opinion. If, after proper inquiry and notice, no response is received from a tribe indicating T.M. is an Indian child, all previous findings and orders shall be reinstated. If a tribe determines T.M. is an Indian child, the juvenile court is ordered to conduct a new section 366.26 hearing in conformity with all provisions of the ICWA. no Flier
08/19/14 B252834

[PDF] [DOC]

Nguyen v. Summergreen Homeowners Assn. CA2/5 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 12/04/13 civil affirm yes Kriegler, Mosk concurring
08/19/14 B251328

[PDF] [DOC]

Franklin v. Town Capital I CA2/4 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 08/30/13 civil affirm no Manella
08/19/14 B250164

[PDF] [DOC]

Dancler v. City of Los Angeles Civil Service Commission CA2/4 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 07/19/13 civil affirm no Willhite
08/19/14 B249709

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Ashanti CA2/1 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 06/27/13 cr affirm appeal deny haebus corpus petition no Rothshild
08/19/14 B249584

[PDF] [DOC]

Currie v. U.S. Bank Nat. Assn. CA2/5 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 06/20/13 civil affirm yes Kriegler
08/19/14 B249365

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Quintana CA2/4 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 06/12/13 cr The convictions are affirmed. The matter is remanded to the superior court for resentencing on counts 1, 2 and 4, and for clarification on count 6. no Manella
08/19/14 B248829

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Coronado CA2/4 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 05/13/13 cr affirm no Manella
08/19/14 B246877M

[PDF] [DOC]

Mike Rovner Construction v. Liberty Surplus Ins. CA2/6 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 02/13/13 civil order modifying opinion no change in judgment   Manella
08/19/14 B246252

[PDF] [DOC]

Velazquez v. Dubrova CA2/4 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 12/28/12 civil affirm no Willhite
08/19/14 B245739

[PDF] [DOC]

Keeney v. John Crane, Inc. CA2/4 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 12/14/12 civil sanctions order affirmed, cross appeal dismissed no Willhite
08/19/14 E060336

[PDF] [DOC]

In re D.D. CA4/2 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 12/27/13 juvenile affirm no Codrington
08/19/14 D065332

[PDF] [DOC]

In re Gabriel S. CA4/1 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 01/28/14 juvenile appeal dismissed no O’Rourke
08/19/14 C072520

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Gueyger CA3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 11/13/12 cr affirm no Raye
08/19/14 B253120

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Nevarez CA2/5 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 12/05/13 cr wende appeal affirm no Mosk
08/19/14 B251905

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Thomas CA2/4 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 09/20/13 cr affirm no Manella
08/19/14 B250541

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Jordan CA2/4 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 08/02/13 cr The judgment is modified to reflect the imposition of a $40 court operations assessment and a $30 court construction fee on each of appellant’s convictions (counts 1 through 5). In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed. no Manella
08/19/14 B249503

[PDF] [DOC]

De Edwards v. Escrow of the West CA2/4 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 06/11/13 cr affirm no Manella
08/19/14 B248232

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Caballero CA2/4 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 04/19/13 cr affirm no Epstein
08/19/14 B244670

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Ramos CA2/6 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 10/19/12 cr affirm no Perren
08/19/14 A138617

[PDF] [DOC]

Galligan & Biscay v. Galligan CA1/1 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 05/09/13 cr The judgment is reversed and the matter is remanded for entry of a new judgment
in favor of defendants, modified to eliminate any attorney fee award to them as the prevailing parties. Each side shall bear its own costs on appeal.
no Margulies
08/19/14 A138043

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Young CA1/3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 02/26/13 cr affirm no McGuiness
08/19/14 A135226

[PDF] [DOC]

Applied Biosystems v. 384 Foster City Blvd. Partners filed 8/19/14 Case Details 04/19/12 civil The order granting respondent’s anti-SLAPP motion is affirmed. Respondent shall recover its costs on appeal no McGuiness
08/19/14 F066726

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Ramos CA5 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 02/19/13 cr affirm no Kane
08/19/14 D063027

[PDF] [DOC]

Angelica Textile Services v.Park CA4/1 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 02/11/13 civil The order awarding Emerald and Park their attorney fees and costs is reversed without prejudice to their right to pursue them in the trial court following resolution of Angelica’s remaining claims. no Benke
08/19/14 C076150

[PDF] [DOC]

In re L.T. CA3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 03/24/14 juvenile affirm no Hull
08/19/14 C075450

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Loera CA3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 12/13/13 cr affirm no Robie
08/19/14 C074507

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Robertson CA3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 08/15/13 cr affirm no Robie
08/19/14 C074347

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v Eusted CA3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 07/17/13 cr affirm no Robie
08/19/14 C073912

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Wesley CA3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 05/28/13 cr affirm no Robie
08/19/14 A136581

[PDF] [DOC]

Korman v. Schott CA1/3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details 09/13/12 civil The orders granting defendant’s special motion to strike and attorney fees and the
judgment in favor of defendant are affirmed. Defendant is awarded costs on appeal
yes Jenkins, Pollak concurring
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s