A list of the unpublished decisions from all six appellate districts is included below.
|Date Posted||Docket #/
|Description||Date initiated||Type of case||Decision||Appellant Self represented||Judge issuing opinion.|
|08/19/14||G048408||P. v. Romero CA4/3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||05/08/13||cr||affirm||no||Thompson|
|08/19/14||G047358||P. v. Vargas CA4/3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||08/31/12||cr||affirm||no||Ikola|
|08/19/14||F066694||P. v. Eshaya CA5 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||02/14/13||cr||The sentence imposed on count II is ordered stayed. The clerk of the court is
directed to prepare an amended abstract of judgment and forward it to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.
|08/19/14||E060557||P.B. v. Superior Court CA4/2 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||02/10/14||juvenile writ petition||affirm||no||Richli|
|08/19/14||E058567||P. v. Constant CA4/2 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||04/15/13||affirm||no||Richli|
|08/19/14||G048445||Harper v. Canyon Hills Community Assn. CA4/3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||05/08/13||civil||The judgment in favor of respondents David and Patricia Valentine is
affirmed and they shall recover their costs on appeal. The judgment in favor of respondent Canyon Hills is reversed and that matter is remanded to the superior court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. Appellant shall recover her costs on appeal related to the judgment for respondent Canyon Hills.
|08/19/14||F067110||Smeed v. Galtar, LLC CA5 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||04/04/13||civil||The judgment is reversed and the matter remanded with directions to strike from
the judgment the award of attorney fees as costs and to reconsider and determine the
amount of compensatory and punitive damages to be awarded in light of our
determination that the breach of contract cause of action was not maliciously prosecuted.
The parties shall bear their own attorney fees and costs on appeal.
|08/19/14||F065631||P. v. Simmons CA5 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||08/24/12||cr||affirm||no||PEÑA, J.|
|08/19/14||E060865||In re E.G. CA4/2 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||03/25/14||juvenile||affirm||no||Codrington|
|08/19/14||E060637||In re M.T. CA4/2 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||02/18/14||juvenile||The February 13, 2014, orders terminating mother’s parental rights and freeing M.T. for adoption are conditionally reversed and a limited remand is ordered as follows. Upon remand, the court shall direct DPSS to send ICWA notices in accordance with the ICWA and California law. DPSS shall thereafter file certified mail return receipts for the
ICWA notice, together with any responses received. If no responses are received, DPSS
shall so inform the court. The court shall determine whether the ICWA noticing has been
completed and whether M.T. is an Indian child. If the court finds M.T. is not an Indian
child, it shall reinstate the orders terminating parental rights and freeing M.T. for
adoption. If the court finds M.T. is an Indian child, it shall conduct all further proceedings in compliance with the ICWA and related law.
|08/19/14||E060590||P. v. Dawson CA4/2 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||02/05/14||cr wende appeal||affirm||no||Hollenhurst|
|08/19/14||E060231||In re J.E. CA4/2 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||12/18/13||juvenile delinquent wende appeal||affirm||no||Hollenhurst|
|08/19/14||E059717||In re K.R. CA4/2 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||09/27/13||juvenile||affirm||no||Ramirez|
|08/19/14||E059539||P. v. Smith CA4/2 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||08/19/13||cr||affirm||no||Ramirez|
|08/19/14||E058109||P. v. Delgado CA4/2 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||02/14/13||cr||affirm||no||King|
|08/19/14||B245446||Boggs v. Franchise Tax Bd. CA2/5 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||11/19/12||civil||The order denying the motion for class certification is affirmed. The Board is
awarded its costs on appeal.
|08/19/14||A140267||In re A.B. CA1/3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||11/13/13||juvenile||In case no. A140267, the August 26, 2013, order is reversed. In case No.
A140583, let a peremptory writ of mandate issue directing respondent court to vacate so
much of its January 13, 2014, order as found mother was offered or provided reasonable
services, terminated reunification services, and set a section 366.26 permanency hearing. On remand the juvenile court is directed to conduct further proceedings consistent with this opinion. The stay issued by this court shall automatically dissolve on the issuance of the remittitur.
|08/19/14||A138408||P. v. Campbell CA1/1 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||04/15/13||cr||The trial court is directed to prepare a corrected abstract of judgment awarding defendant two days of local conduct credit under section 4019 in addition to the two days for actual time in local custody, and to forward a certified copy of the corrected abstract of judgment to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.||no||Becton|
|08/19/14||A135565||P. v. Porter CA1/1 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||05/11/12||cr||affirm||no||Becton|
|08/19/14||E060614||In re E.C. CA4/2 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||01/06/14||juvenile||affirm||no||Richli|
|08/19/14||E060591||P. v. James CA4/2 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||02/05/14||cr||The order denying defendant’s petition to recall his three strikes sentence is Affirmed||no||McKinster|
|08/19/14||C075696||In re L.B. CA3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||01/30/14||juvenile||appeal dismissed as nonjusticiable.||no||Hull|
|08/19/14||C072675||P. v. Woloszyn CA3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||11/14/12||cr||affirm||no||Nicholson|
|08/19/14||B255305||P. v. Martinez CA2/1 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||03/27/14||cr wende appeal||affirm||no||Rothshild|
|08/19/14||B253175||In re T.M. CA2/8 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||12/09/13||juvenile||The order terminating parental rights is conditionally reversed, and the matter is remanded to the juvenile court with directions to order compliance with the notice provisions of the ICWA in accordance with this opinion. If, after proper inquiry and notice, no response is received from a tribe indicating T.M. is an Indian child, all previous findings and orders shall be reinstated. If a tribe determines T.M. is an Indian child, the juvenile court is ordered to conduct a new section 366.26 hearing in conformity with all provisions of the ICWA.||no||Flier|
|08/19/14||B252834||Nguyen v. Summergreen Homeowners Assn. CA2/5 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||12/04/13||civil||affirm||yes||Kriegler, Mosk concurring|
|08/19/14||B251328||Franklin v. Town Capital I CA2/4 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||08/30/13||civil||affirm||no||Manella|
|08/19/14||B250164||Dancler v. City of Los Angeles Civil Service Commission CA2/4 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||07/19/13||civil||affirm||no||Willhite|
|08/19/14||B249709||P. v. Ashanti CA2/1 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||06/27/13||cr||affirm appeal deny haebus corpus petition||no||Rothshild|
|08/19/14||B249584||Currie v. U.S. Bank Nat. Assn. CA2/5 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||06/20/13||civil||affirm||yes||Kriegler|
|08/19/14||B249365||P. v. Quintana CA2/4 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||06/12/13||cr||The convictions are affirmed. The matter is remanded to the superior court for resentencing on counts 1, 2 and 4, and for clarification on count 6.||no||Manella|
|08/19/14||B248829||P. v. Coronado CA2/4 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||05/13/13||cr||affirm||no||Manella|
|08/19/14||B246877M||Mike Rovner Construction v. Liberty Surplus Ins. CA2/6 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||02/13/13||civil||order modifying opinion no change in judgment||Manella|
|08/19/14||B246252||Velazquez v. Dubrova CA2/4 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||12/28/12||civil||affirm||no||Willhite|
|08/19/14||B245739||Keeney v. John Crane, Inc. CA2/4 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||12/14/12||civil||sanctions order affirmed, cross appeal dismissed||no||Willhite|
|08/19/14||E060336||In re D.D. CA4/2 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||12/27/13||juvenile||affirm||no||Codrington|
|08/19/14||D065332||In re Gabriel S. CA4/1 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||01/28/14||juvenile||appeal dismissed||no||O’Rourke|
|08/19/14||C072520||P. v. Gueyger CA3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||11/13/12||cr||affirm||no||Raye|
|08/19/14||B253120||P. v. Nevarez CA2/5 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||12/05/13||cr wende appeal||affirm||no||Mosk|
|08/19/14||B251905||P. v. Thomas CA2/4 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||09/20/13||cr||affirm||no||Manella|
|08/19/14||B250541||P. v. Jordan CA2/4 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||08/02/13||cr||The judgment is modified to reflect the imposition of a $40 court operations assessment and a $30 court construction fee on each of appellant’s convictions (counts 1 through 5). In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.||no||Manella|
|08/19/14||B249503||De Edwards v. Escrow of the West CA2/4 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||06/11/13||cr||affirm||no||Manella|
|08/19/14||B248232||P. v. Caballero CA2/4 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||04/19/13||cr||affirm||no||Epstein|
|08/19/14||B244670||P. v. Ramos CA2/6 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||10/19/12||cr||affirm||no||Perren|
|08/19/14||A138617||Galligan & Biscay v. Galligan CA1/1 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||05/09/13||cr||The judgment is reversed and the matter is remanded for entry of a new judgment
in favor of defendants, modified to eliminate any attorney fee award to them as the prevailing parties. Each side shall bear its own costs on appeal.
|08/19/14||A138043||P. v. Young CA1/3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||02/26/13||cr||affirm||no||McGuiness|
|08/19/14||A135226||Applied Biosystems v. 384 Foster City Blvd. Partners filed 8/19/14 Case Details||04/19/12||civil||The order granting respondent’s anti-SLAPP motion is affirmed. Respondent shall recover its costs on appeal||no||McGuiness|
|08/19/14||F066726||P. v. Ramos CA5 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||02/19/13||cr||affirm||no||Kane|
|08/19/14||D063027||Angelica Textile Services v.Park CA4/1 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||02/11/13||civil||The order awarding Emerald and Park their attorney fees and costs is reversed without prejudice to their right to pursue them in the trial court following resolution of Angelica’s remaining claims.||no||Benke|
|08/19/14||C076150||In re L.T. CA3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||03/24/14||juvenile||affirm||no||Hull|
|08/19/14||C075450||P. v. Loera CA3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||12/13/13||cr||affirm||no||Robie|
|08/19/14||C074507||P. v. Robertson CA3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||08/15/13||cr||affirm||no||Robie|
|08/19/14||C074347||P. v Eusted CA3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||07/17/13||cr||affirm||no||Robie|
|08/19/14||C073912||P. v. Wesley CA3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||05/28/13||cr||affirm||no||Robie|
|08/19/14||A136581||Korman v. Schott CA1/3 filed 8/19/14 Case Details||09/13/12||civil||The orders granting defendant’s special motion to strike and attorney fees and the
judgment in favor of defendant are affirmed. Defendant is awarded costs on appeal
|yes||Jenkins, Pollak concurring|