CA court of Appeal Stats 8/20-8/22/2014

A list of the unpublished decisions from all six appellate districts is included below.

Date Posted

Docket #/

File Format

Description Date filed Type of case Decision Appellant self represented Judge issuing opinion
08/22/14

G048238

[PDF] [DOC]

The Joint Equity Committee v. Genovese CA4/3 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 03/22/13 civil affirm no Thompson
08/22/14

G047876

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Martinez CA4/3 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 01/04/13 cr affirm no Fybel
08/22/14

B249719

[PDF] [DOC]

Cheviot Hills Sports Center v. City of Los Angeles CA2/3 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 06/28/13 cr

The judgment is reversed as to the trial court’s findings regarding forcible entry and detainer. The judgment is affirmed with regard to Cheviot Hills’ cause of action for breach of Civil Code section 52.1. The case is remanded for entry of judgment against Defendant City of Los Angeles for forcible entry and detainer, and for the trial court’s determination and award of nominal damages to Plaintiff Cheviot Hills. In the interests of justice, the parties shall bear their own costs

no Kitching
08/22/14

B249430

[PDF] [DOC]

Henschel v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems CA2/5 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 06/11/13 civil affirm no Mink
08/22/14

B247957

[PDF] [DOC]

Adams v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center CA2/3 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 04/02/13 civil affirm no Kitching
08/22/14

B247064

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Parker CA2/5 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 02/08/13 cr

Defendant’s judgment is modified to provide that defendant is not entitled to 85 days of conduct credit. The matter is remanded for the trial court to amend the abstract of judgment accordingly. The trial court shall forward the amended abstract of judgment to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. In all other respects, the judgment is

Affirmed.

no Mosk
08/22/14

B242756

[PDF] [DOC]

In re S.C. CA2/3 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 07/13/12 juvenile affirm termination of father’s parental rights no Kitching
08/22/14

A140749

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Rosalinda C. CA1/1 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 01/10/14 cr wende appeal

The court’s order extending the commitment from November 15, 2013 to

November 15, 2014 is affirmed.

no Becton
08/22/14

G048182

[PDF] [DOC]

Yu v. Landmark American Ins. Co. CA4/3 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 03/13/13 civil affirm no Thompson
08/22/14

E052469

[PDF] [DOC]

Hughes v. Pham CA4/2 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 12/03/10 civil

The superior court is directed to correct the judgment as follows:

1. Offset the judgment for Trent Hughes’ economic damages by

$2,707,296;

2. Offset the judgment for Trent Hughes’ noneconomic damages by

$146,364;

3. Offset the judgment for Lisa Hughes’ damages by $146,340;

4. Recalculate the periodic payments applying the above offset to Trent

Hughes’ economic damages; and

5. Delete the requirement that defendant post security for payment of the

Judgment.

no McKinster
08/22/14

A137442

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Chae CA1/3 filed 8/22/14 Case Detail 12/28/12 cr affirm no Jenkins
08/22/14

H040024

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Rubalcava CA6 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 08/06/13 cr court’s commitment order is affirmed no Elia
08/22/14

G049832M

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Gonzalez CA4/3 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 01/02/13 cr order modifying opinion no change in judgment no Moore
08/22/14

D064832

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Hudson CA4/1 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 10/28/13 cr wende appeal affirm no Benke
08/22/14

C075448

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Soliz CA3 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 12/16/13 cr wende appeal affirm no Blease
08/22/14

C072371M

[PDF] [DOC]

Lovelace v. Pneumo Abex CA3 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 10/17/12 civil order modifying opinion no change in judgment no Nicholson
08/22/14

C071598

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Heuser CA3 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 07/11/12 cr

The judgment entered in case No. SF10-027 is affirmed. The judgment entered in

case No. SF10-165 is modified as follows: (1) sentence imposed for transportation of

methamphetamine is stayed pursuant to Penal Code section 654; and (2) two Health and

Safety Code section 11370.2 enhancements are stricken pursuant to Penal Code

section 1385. As modified, the judgment is affirmed.

no Hoch
08/22/14

A139287

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Ford-Howard CA1/2 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 07/22/13 cr

The judgment of conviction is vacated, and the cause is remanded for further

proceedings consistent with this opinion. Petitioner is to be credited with time served,

including applicable credits for time served in state prison, and applicable credits for time

served in county jail prior to his placement in state prison. We further order that

petitioner be given the opportunity to accept the plea offer made at the pretrial conference

in March 2013 and the parties present the plea bargain to the superior court. The appeal

from the judgment is dismissed as moot.

no Richman
08/22/14

H040427

[PDF] [DOC]

In re S.A. CA6 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 11/27/13 juvenile affirm no Premo
08/22/14

G049735

[PDF] [DOC]

In re G.A. CA4/3 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 02/27/14 juvenile affirm no O’Leary
08/22/14

C074334

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Deo CA3 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 07/15/13 cr

The matter is remanded to the superior court, which is directed to amend both the

minute order and the judgment and order granting probation to separately state the

penalty assessments imposed by the trial court along with the statutory basis for each

assessment imposed. As modified, the judgment is affirmed. The clerk of the superior

court is directed to forward a certified copy of the amended judgment and order granting

probation to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

no Raye
08/22/14

C072247

[PDF] [DOC]

Walker v. Citibank CA3 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 09/28/12 civil affirm no Raye
08/22/14

C071431

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Dufour CA3 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 06/26/12 cr

The judgment is reversed as to count 7, receiving stolen property. In all other

respects, the judgment is affirmed

no Raye
08/22/14

B253941

[PDF] [DOC]

In re J.R. CA2/1 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 01/17/14 juvenile affirm no Johnson
08/22/14

B253599

[PDF] [DOC]

In re J.C. CA2/8 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 01/06/14 juvenile

The order terminating parental rights is reversed. The case is remanded to the

juvenile court with directions to order DCFS to send notice to the Cayuga Nation of New

York, the Onondaga Nation and the Tonawanda Band of Seneca in accordance with

ICWA. If, after proper notice, the court finds that J.C. is an Indian child, the court shall

proceed in conformity with ICWA. If, after proper notice, the court finds that J.C. is not

an Indian child, the order terminating parental rights and selecting adoption as the

permanent plan shall be reinstated

no Rubin
08/22/14

B253529M

[PDF] [DOC]

Anchor Pacifica Management Co. v. Green CA2/7 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 01/08/14 civil order modifying opinion no change in judgment no Perluss
08/22/14

B253138M

[PDF] [DOC]

In re S.J. CA2/1 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 11/27/13 juvenile order modifying opinion no change in judgment no Rothshild
08/22/14

B248686

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Medeiros CA2/4 filed 8/22/14 Case Details 05/09/13 cr affirm no Willhite
08/21/14

F068835

[PDF] [DOC]

In re R.T. CA5 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 02/03/14 juvenile affirm no Cornell
08/21/14

E061405

[PDF] [DOC]

Martin v. Super. Ct. CA4/2 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 06/26/14 civil

writ petition granted Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandate is granted. Let a peremptory writ of

mandate issue, directing the Superior Court of San Bernardino County to vacate its order

expunging the notice of lis pendens, and to enter a new order denying said motion.

no King
08/21/14

C075833

[PDF] [DOC]

Conservatorship of Donald J. CA3 filed 8/21/14 Case Details no docket civil conservatorship affirm no docket Duarte
08/21/14

C071677

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Miller CA3 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 07/23/12 cr affirm no Hoch
08/21/14

B239435

[PDF] [DOC]

Pricaspian Development v. Ficeto CA2/3 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 02/27/12 civil affirm no Croskey
08/21/14

B237613

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Freeman CA2/6 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 12/05/11 cr affirm no Gilbert
08/21/14

A140701

[PDF] [DOC]

In re E.W. CA1/3 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 01/07/14 juvenile affirm no Siggins
08/21/14

H040313

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Wilson CA6 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 10/16/13 cr

The probation condition that provides “You shall not possess or consume any

alcohol or illegal drugs including marijuana, and even if you have a medical marijuana 9

card – nor shall you knowingly go to places where those items are being offered for sale

or being consumed” is modified to provide:

“You shall not knowingly possess or consume any alcohol or illegal drugs

including marijuana, even if you have a medical marijuana card, nor shall you knowingly

go to places where those items are being offered for sale or being consumed.”

As modified, the judgment is affirme

no BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN
08/21/14

G049896

[PDF] [DOC]

Moffett v. Lampe Group CA4/3 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 08/09/12 civil affirm no Moore
08/21/14

D064257

[PDF] [DOC]

Gardner v. Maas CA4/1 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 07/17/13 civil affirm no Benke
08/21/14

D062980

[PDF] [DOC]

Willow Bend v. City of Holtville CA4/1 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 01/30/13 civil

The judgment is affirmed. The order denying attorney fees is reversed insofar as

Barton is concerned, and the matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings

in accordance with this opinion. The order is affirmed in all other respects. In light of 24

the mixed results here, the parties shall bear their own costs on appeal. (Rule

8.278(a)(5)

no Huffman
08/21/14

C073483

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Holland CA3 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 04/09/13 cr affirm no Raye
08/21/14

C072954

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Bean CA3 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 01/17/13 cr affirm no Hoch
08/21/14

C072287

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Morales CA3 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 09/20/12 cr

The judgment is modified to strike the enhancement imposed under Penal Code

section 667.5, subdivision (b), based on defendant’s 1988 conviction. As modified, the

judgment is affirmed. The trial court is directed to amend the abstract of judgment to

reflect this modification and to forward a certified copy of the amended abstract to the

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

no Hoch
08/21/14

B252671

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Gaitan CA2/3 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 11/01/13 cr wende appeal affirm no Aldrich
08/21/14

B249637

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Watson CA2/2 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 06/25/13 cr affirm no Ferns
08/21/14

B248658

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Fair CA2/3 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 04/29/13 cr

The judgment is modified as follows. Sentence on count 2 is stayed pursuant to

Penal Code section 654. Fair is awarded 24 days of presentence conduct credit, not 157,

for a total of 181 days. The court security fee imposed pursuant to section 1465.8 is

increased to $80. The criminal conviction assessment imposed pursuant to Government

Code section 70373 is increased to $60. The Clerk of the Superior Court is directed to

prepare a corrected abstract of judgment and forward it to the Department of Corrections.

In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.

no Aldrich
08/21/14

B247087

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Medrano CA2/4 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 02/15/13 cr

The convictions are affirmed, and the matter remanded with directions to the

superior court to modify the abstract of judgment to correct the amount of

assessments and fines. On remand, the clerk of the superior court shall prepare and

deliver to the Department of Corrections an amended abstract of judgment

consistent with this opinion. As amended, the judgment is affirmed

no Manella
08/21/14

B245905M

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Amaya CA2/3 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 12/21/12 cr order modifying opinion no change in judgment no  
08/21/14

A139431

[PDF] [DOC]

Bonomi v. City etc. San Francisco CA1/3 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 08/05/13 civil affirm no Jenkins
08/21/14

A139088

[PDF] [DOC]

Rochambeau v. Wells Fargo Bank CA1/1 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 06/19/13 civil affirm yes Banke
08/21/14

A138496

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Medina CA1/1 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 04/26/13 cr

The trial court’s order of direct restitution in favor of Beverly Rhoads is modified

to restitution in the amount of $92,240.57. So modified, the restitution order is affirmed.

no Becton
08/21/14

H040727

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Feliciano CA6 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 02/25/14 cr wende appeal affirm no Elia
08/21/14

H039945

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Morones CA6 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 07/24/13 cr

Probation condition No. 24 is modified to read, “You are not to knowingly have

access to, use, or possess any police scanner device or surveillance equipment that you

intend to use to monitor the police, whether on your person, in your vehicle, at your place

of residence, or among your personal effects.” The case is remanded to the trial court to

correct the sentencing minutes with respect to condition No. 9. As modified, the

judgment is affirmed.

no Elia
08/21/14

G049739

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Hatch CA4/3 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 02/25/14 cr wende appeal affirm no Aronson
08/21/14

F064211

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Pantaleon CA5 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 01/12/12 cr affirm no Gomes
08/21/14

D063852

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Weese CA4/1 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 05/02/13 cr affirm no Irion
08/21/14

C072207

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Shaw CA3 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 10/02/12 cr affirm no Butz
08/21/14

B253798

[PDF] [DOC]

In re Nadia H. CA2/6 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 01/21/14 juvenile appeal dismissed as to father as abandoned, affirmed as to mother no Yeegan
08/21/14

B253417

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Amador CA2/1 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 12/13/13 cr wende appeal affirm no Miller
08/21/14

B250540

[PDF] [DOC]

In re Rogelio C. CA2/3 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 05/10/13 juvenile affirm no Aldrich
08/21/14

B249669

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Sutherland CA2/8 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 06/19/13 cr

The judgment is modified as to Sutherland as to only the terms of his probation

and the court security and criminal conviction assessment fees. The matter is remanded

to the trial court with directions to eliminate the fees as conditions of probation and enter

them as separate orders. The trial court must also modify the terms of probation to

include the distance and knowledge requirements as set forth in our decision. The

judgment as so modified is affirmed.

The judgment is reversed as to Gibbs for the sole purpose of conducting a new

Marsden hearing, after which the trial court shall exercise its discretion to either order a

new trial, reinstate the judgment, or proceed as otherwise authorized by law. If the trial

court reinstates the judgment as to Gibbs, it shall modify the judgment to amend the

terms of probation in regard to knowledge and distance as set forth in our decision and

shall eliminate the court security and criminal conviction assessment fees as conditions of 18

probation and enter them as separate orders. If that is the outcome, then the modified

judgment is affirmed.

no Rubin
08/21/14

B249321

[PDF] [DOC]

Udi v. Fein et al. CA2/2 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 06/07/13 civil

The appeal from the summary judgment is dismissed. The orders denying the 17

motion to set aside the summary judgment and dismissing the action are affirmed.

Respondents are awarded their costs on appeal

no Ferns
08/21/14

F068822

[PDF] [DOC]

In re I.G. CA5 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 02/03/14 juvenile affirm no Gomes
08/21/14

F068152

[PDF] [DOC]

In re Anthony L. CA5 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 10/07/13 juvenile delinquent cr wende appeal affirm no Poochigian
08/21/14

F065845

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Barrientos CA5 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 09/24/12 cr judgment reversed, remanded for possible retrial no Poochigian
08/21/14

E056683

[PDF] [DOC]

Signature Log Homes v. Fidelity National Title CA4/2 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 06/28/12 civil affirm no McKinster
08/21/14

D064506

[PDF] [DOC]

Coalition etc. Del Mar Beach Club v. Del Mar Beach Club Owners Assn. CA4/1 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 08/27/13 civil affirm no Huffman
08/21/14

D064385

[PDF] [DOC]

Fuerst v. Kirby CA4/1 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 08/06/13 civil affirm appeal not meritless In Re Marriage of Flaherty, sanctions not warranted. no Benke
08/21/14

B254129

[PDF] [DOC]

In re Gabriel C. CA2/6 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 02/05/14 juvenile affirm no Yegan
08/21/14

B249810

[PDF] [DOC]

Arthur v. Davies CA2/6 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 07/02/13 civil affirm no Yegan
08/21/14

B245815

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Maldonado CA2/7 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 12/13/12 cr affirm no Woods
08/21/14

A139947

[PDF] [DOC]

Estrella v. Foshtomi CA1/1 filed 8/21/14 Case Details 09/25/13 civil family law appeal dismissed yes Humes
08/20/14

G050193

[PDF] [DOC]

Leann S. v. Super. Ct. CA4/3 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 05/21/14 juvenile wit petition denied no Moore
08/20/14

G049801

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Martinez CA4/3 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 06/27/12 cr affirm, correct abstract no O’Leary
08/20/14

G049518

[PDF] [DOC]

Camargo v. John F. Kennedy Mem. Hospital CA4/3 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 06/13/11 civil

The original judgment against JFK, entered April 28, 2011, is reversed with

directions to the trial court to reduce the damages against JFK to an amount consistent

with MICRA and Proposition 51, and to set off the amount of plaintiffs’ settlements with

Dr. Thakur and Dr. Vinh against the damages against JFK, but is otherwise affirmed as

against JFK. The judgment vacating the original judgment against Palo Verde, entered

on August 25, 2011, is reversed. The postjudgment order granting the motion for a new

trial in favor of Palo Verde is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the matter is

remanded for a new trial on the cause of action against Palo Verde for fraudulent

concealment. The postjudgment order denying an award of attorney fees is affirmed.

14 If plaintiffs were correct in their argument that willful misconduct was a

separate, intentional tort, then the instruction regarding willful misconduct would have

been prejudicially erroneous for failing to instruct on all the elements of the cause of

action, and the special verdict form would have been insufficient for failing to make

findings on necessary elements. In that case, of course, we would be required to reverse

the judgment against JFK in its entirety. 35

Because all parties prevailed in part on their various appeals, all parties shall bear their

own costs on appeal.

no Fybel
08/20/14

G049200

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Spates CA4/3 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 10/23/13 cr affirm no Ikola
08/20/14

G048156M

[PDF] [DOC]

Federal Nat. Mortgage Assn. v. Rothman CA4/3 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 03/08/13 civil order modifying opinion no change in judgment no Moore
08/20/14

F066398

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Vera CA5 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 01/04/13 cr affirm no Poochigian
08/20/14

F061984

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Garcia CA5 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 02/22/11 cr

Counts 12, 17, 18, and 19 and any enhancements appended thereto are reversed.

The judgment is vacated and the matter is remanded to the trial court to conduct a full

Marsden hearing. If the trial court grants the motion, the matter shall proceed 62.

accordingly. If the motion is denied, the trial court shall conduct a resentencing hearing

and a new restitution hearing in conformance with this opinion and enter a new judgment.

no Cornell
08/20/14

B247216

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Zamudio CA2/8 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 02/28/13 cr affirm no Bigelow, Rubin dissenting and concurring
08/20/14

B246086

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Morris CA2/3 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 01/04/13 cr

The order of sentencing is reversed insofar as the trial court failed to impose

a term for, or to strike, the section 12022.7, subdivision (a), finding. In all other respects,

the judgment is affirmed. The cause is remanded for sentencing on the enhancement.

no Klein
08/20/14

B245725

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Atkinson CA2/6 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 12/11/12 cr affirm no Burke
08/20/14

A138907

[PDF] [DOC]

In re V.G. CA1/5 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 05/31/13 juvenile delinquent

The matter is remanded to the juvenile court with instructions to correct the record

to reflect that Minor’s MTC is two years, nine months and to correct the clerical errors

identified in part VI of this opinion. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.

no Jones
08/20/14

F068342

[PDF] [DOC]

In re K.P. CA5 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 11/01/13 juvenile delinquent affirm no Gomes
08/20/14

F067907

[PDF] [DOC]

In re Alejandro V. CA5 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 08/23/13 juvenile delinquent affirm no Cornell
08/20/14

F066758

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Vo CA5 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 02/22/13 cr affirm no Gomes
08/20/14

F064184

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Rincon CA5 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 01/11/12 cr affirm no Gomes
08/20/14

E059822

[PDF] [DOC]

In re K.P. CA4/2 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 10/15/13 juvenile affirm no King
08/20/14

C074326

[PDF] [DOC]

In re I.F. CA3 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 07/18/13 juvenile affirm no Blease
08/20/14

C072147

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Ennis CA3 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 09/11/12 cr

In case No. C072147, defendant’s convictions on counts one and two are reversed

and the trial court is directed to enter dismissal of both counts. In case No. C074131, the

People’s appeal is dismissed as moot.

no Hoch
08/20/14

B248846

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Lazaro CA2/5 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 05/10/13 cr affirm no Mosk
08/20/14

B245457

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Baeza CA2/5 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 11/30/12 cr

Baeza’s abstract of judgment is ordered modified to reflect a stay of imposition of

sentence on his burglary and kidnapping convictions under section 654, and his case is

remanded to the trial court for resentencing on his being a felon in possession of a firearm

conviction. Benavidez’s abstract of judgment is ordered modified to reflect a stay of

imposition of sentence on his burglary, kidnapping, and being a felon in possession of a

firearm under section 654 and to strike the $1,000 section 1202.45 parole revocation

restitution fine. Benavidez’s case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings,

as set forth above, in connection with the allegations that Benavidez suffered four prior

convictions within the meaning of section 667.5, subdivision (b). The judgments are

otherwise affirmed

no Mosk
08/20/14

B245304

[PDF] [DOC]

Marriage of Molle CA2/4 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 11/15/12 civil family law affirm no Manella
08/20/14

E058643

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Lewis CA4/2 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 04/30/13 cr

The judgment is reversed and remanded with directions to allow the trial court to

examine the evidence adduced at trial to determine and state on the record whether the

prosecution’s case was based on the theory that defendant was guilty of possession of a

firearm by a felon based on evidence consistent with this opinion. The trial court shall

then act on defendant’s resentencing petition in a manner consistent with this opinion.

no Ramirez
08/20/14

D063578

[PDF] [DOC]

Sinclair v. Praxair CA4/1 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 02/20/13 civil affirm no McConnell
08/20/14

B252937

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Chhaim CA2/8 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 11/07/13 cr

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for the limited purpose of

resentencing appellant in accordance with the views expressed in this opinion.

no Flier
08/20/14

B252066

[PDF] [DOC]

Briscoe v. The Painted Nail CA2/7 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 10/16/13 cr

The judgment is affirmed. On remand, Briscoe must file with the court an

executed release in compliance with Civil Code section 1542 and shall thereafter be

entitled to recover costs. The trial court is to determine Briscoe’s fees on appeal.

no Zelon
08/20/14

B251472

[PDF] [DOC]

Donaldson v. Ojaroodi CA2/7 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 09/12/13 civil civil harassment order yes Zelon
08/20/14

B251450

[PDF] [DOC]

In re S.M. CA2/7 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 09/11/13 juvenile affirm no Perluss
08/20/14

B248219

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Daley CA2/7 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 04/17/13 cr affirm no Zelon
08/20/14

B247779

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Cromer CA2/1 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 03/26/13 cr affirm no Miller
08/20/14

B245779

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Jackson CA2/7 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 12/10/12 cr

The judgment is reversed, and the matter remanded for the trial court to determine

whether to conduct an evidentiary hearing on Jackson’s motion to withdraw his plea,

including taking testimony from Atkins if he is available and willing to testify, or to

decide Jackson’s motion based on Atkins’s declaration and any other supporting

Documents.

no Zelon
08/20/14

B245418

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Washington CA2/7 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 11/16/12 cr

The judgment is modified to strike count 9 and the $10,000 parole revocation fine

and to reflect the trial court’s imposition of an indeterminate sentence of life without

parole plus five years under count 10, to run consecutively to the sentence impose on

count 6. In all other respects the judgment is affirmed. The superior court is directed to

prepare a corrected abstract of judgment and to forward it to the Department of

Corrections and Rehabilitation.

no Perluss
08/20/14

G048748

[PDF] [DOC]

In re Infusion Pump Cases CA4/3 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 07/19/13 civil affirm no Ikola
08/20/14

E059361

[PDF] [DOC]

In re K.P. CA4/2 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 08/05/13 juvenile affirm no King
08/20/14

E057591

[PDF] [DOC]

In re K.P. CA4/2 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 11/26/12 juvenile affirm no King
08/20/14

C071416

[PDF] [DOC]

Scottsdale Indemnity v. Nat. Continental Ins. CA3 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 06/13/12 civil affirm no Raye
08/20/14

B254845

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Higgins CA2/2 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 03/07/14 cr affirm no Boren
08/20/14

B251014

[PDF] [DOC]

Craig v. Saddle Ranch Chop House CA2/7 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 08/28/13 civil affirm no Perluss
08/20/14

B247989

[PDF] [DOC]

Marriage of Ruballos CA2/7 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 04/04/13 civil family law affirm yes Perluss
08/20/14

B247335

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Sauls CA2/7 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 02/27/13 cr

Sauls’s conviction for first degree robbery (count 8) is reversed with the following

directions: If the People do not retry Sauls for first degree robbery pursuant to section

1382, subdivision (a)(2), within 60 days after the remittitur is filed or if the People file a

written election not to retry Sauls, the trial court shall proceed as if the remittitur

modified the judgment to reflect a conviction for grand theft from a person rather than for

first degree robbery on count 8 and resentence Sauls accordingly, as well as to correct the

sentencing error discussed in footnote 2, above. The convictions on all other counts are

affirmed.

no Perluss
08/20/14

B247272

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Renteria CA2/8 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 03/04/13 cr affirm no Bigelow
08/20/14

B246196

[PDF] [DOC]

Bowers v. Abercrombie & Fitch CA2/7 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 12/28/12 civil affirm no Zelon
08/20/14

H039857

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Larkin CA6 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 06/28/13 cr affirm no Elia
08/20/14

E059786

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Gutierrez CA4/2 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 10/08/13 cr affirm no Hollenhurst
08/20/14

D065468

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Wilson CA4/1 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 09/21/12 cr affirm no. McDonald
08/20/14

D064769

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Smith CA4/1 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 09/24/13 cr affirm no Nares
08/20/14

C075226

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Colburn CA3 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 11/18/13 cr wende appeal affirm no Nicholson
08/20/14

C073196

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Conley CA3 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 02/07/13 cr affirm no Nicholson
08/20/14

C071542

[PDF] [DOC]

Marriage of Sample CA3 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 07/06/12 civil family law affirm no Nicholson
08/20/14

B254833

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Byrd CA2/2 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 02/25/14 cr wende appeal affirm no Boren
08/20/14

B247292

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Alvarado CA2/2 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 03/05/13 cr

The judgments are modified to reduce defendants’ convictions in count 6 to the

lesser included offense of misdemeanor vandalism. The matter is remanded for

resentencing in count 6 and for a new trial on Morales’s prior prison-term allegation. In

all other respects, the judgments are affirmed. The superior court is directed to amend 30

the abstracts of judgment accordingly and to reflect that the section 12022.53, subdivision

(b) enhancement was imposed in counts 1 through 4 only.

no Boren
08/20/14

A135813

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Ramos CA1/3 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 06/15/12 cr

The abstract of judgment shall be modified to strike the 25-year-to-life terms

imposed for counts 1 through 3. The judgment is affirmed in all other respects.

no Pollak
08/20/14

E058762

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Lopez CA4/2 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 05/13/13 cr

The superior court is directed to strike the four one-year enhancements under

section 667.5, subdivision (b), pursuant to section 1385, and to correct the sentencing

minute order and the abstract of judgment to reflect a six-month sentence for count 3.

The superior court clerk shall forward the corrected minutes and abstract of

judgment to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. In all other respects, the

judgment is affirmed.

no McKinster
08/20/14

E054887

[PDF] [DOC]

Harris v. Bank of America CA4/2 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 10/24/11 civil affirm BOA/Countrywide/landsafe false land appraisal claim self represented attorney Miller
08/20/14

D064557

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Mendoza CA4/1 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 09/10/13 cr affirm no Huffman
08/20/14

C075072

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Levos CA3 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 10/29/13 cr wende appeal affirm no Duarte
08/20/14

C072228

[PDF] [DOC]

In re J.M. CA3 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 10/02/12 juvenile affirm no Duarte
08/20/14

C072000

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Flenory-Davis CA3 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 09/07/12 cr

The judgment as modified as described in this opinion and the cause is remanded

to the trial court for resentencing on count two consistent with this opinion. Following

resentencing, the trial court shall prepare and forward to the Department of Corrections

and Rehabilitation certified copies of amended determinate and indeterminate abstracts of

judgment reflecting our modifications and the new sentence on count two.

no Duarte
08/20/14

C069959

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Lacayo CA3 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 12/12/11 cr affirm no Duarte
08/20/14

B250194

[PDF] [DOC]

Carter v. Brooks CA2/7 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 07/22/13 civil affirm no Woods
08/20/14

B244502

[PDF] [DOC]

Bode v. Los Angeles Doctors Hospital CA2/5 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 10/11/12 civil

The judgment and the order granting summary adjudication are conditionally

reversed. The trial court is directed to enter a new and different order granting summary

adjudication of the issue of immunity under Civil Code 43.97, the cause of action for

intentional infliction of emotional distress and the claim for punitive damages. The case

is remanded for the limited purpose of determining the issue of immunity under HCQIA

by way of a motion by Bode for summary adjudication, a court or jury trial on disputed

factual issues, or other appropriate procedure. If the court resolves the issue of HCQIA

immunity in favor of Bode, the judgment awarding damages is reinstated in the modified

amount of $1,927,000. Appellants Pacific Health Corporation, Los Angeles Doctors

Hospital Corporation, Los Angeles Doctors Corporation, and Medical Staff of Los

Angeles Metropolitan Medical Center are awarded their costs on appeal.

no Kriegler
08/20/14

A136743

[PDF] [DOC]

P. v. Roston CA1/2 filed 8/20/14 Case Details 09/27/12 cr affirm no Kline
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s