CA Court of Appeal Stats for the week of 11/10-11/14/2014

A list of the unpublished decisions from all six appellate districts is included below.

Date Posted
Docket #/

File Format

Description Date filed Type of Case Decision Appellant self represented Appeal court justice
11/14/14 G049254

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Cayetano CA4/3 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
11/08/13 cr Affirm no Rylaarsdam
11/14/14 F069269

[PDF] [ DOC]

In re J.C. CA5 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
04/21/14 juvenile Affirm no Levy
11/14/14 F068860

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Fraser CA5 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
02/13/14 cr wende appeal Affirm no Poochigian
11/14/14 F067727

[PDF] [ DOC]

In re David B. CA5 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
08/05/13 juvenile Affirm no Levy
11/14/14 F066751

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Kouwastica CA5 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
02/11/13 cr wende appeal The judgment is modified to reduce Kouwastica’s award of presentence custody

credit from 537 days to 403 days as calculated above.

no Cornell
11/14/14 F066300

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Larrea CA5 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
12/03/12 cr The trial court is ordered to amend both Gaeta’s and Larrea’s abstract of judgment

to delete the $240 section 1202.45 fine which was ordered and stayed pending successful

completion of parole

no Franson
11/14/14 F065302

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Starling CA5 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
07/06/12 cr wende appeal Affirm no Kane
11/14/14 E061002

[PDF] [ DOC]

In re N.H. CA4/2 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
04/16/14 juvenile Affirm no Codrington
11/14/14 E060848

[PDF] [ DOC]

In re D.W. CA4/2 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
03/25/14 juvenile Affirm no Codrington
11/14/14 E059527

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Superior Court CA4/2 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
09/03/13 writ petition Let a writ of mandate issue directing the Superior Court of Riverside County to set

aside its order finding Perez eligible for resentencing under Penal code section 1170.126

and to issue a new and different order denying his petition for recall of sentence.

no Miller
11/14/14 E059313

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. George CA4/2 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
07/31/13 cr We modify the sentence to stay the terms imposed for count 3, and we remand for

resentencing on counts 1 and 2.

no Ramirez
11/14/14 E058237

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Neste CA4/2 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
03/05/13 cr Affirm no Mkinster
11/14/14 A142722

[PDF] [ DOC]

C.S. v. Superior Court CA1/4 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
08/11/14 juvenile writ petition The petitions are granted. The juvenile court is ordered to vacate its orders of

August 7, 2014 terminating parents’ reunification services and bypassing reunification

services as to T.M. and setting a section 366.26 hearing, and to issue new orders

In light of our decision, we need not reach the other issues raised by the parties.

no Rivera
11/14/14 A140626

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Pierce CA1/1 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
12/30/13 cr wende appeal Affirm no Margulies
11/14/14 F067049

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Bueno CA5 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
04/08/13 cr Affirm no Gomes
11/14/14 C075373

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Lopez CA3 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
11/22/13 cr wende appeal Affirm no Duarte
11/14/14 C074153

[PDF] [ DOC]

Barron v. Cook CA3 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
05/23/13 civil family law Affirm yes Duarte
11/14/14 C073211

[PDF] [ DOC]

Barron v. Cook CA3 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
02/25/13 civil family law Affirm yes Duarte
11/14/14 C071755

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Buckner CA3 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
08/06/12 cr Affirm no Murray
11/14/14 B254887

[PDF] [ DOC]

Arnold v. Superior Court CA2/5 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
03/13/14 writ petition denied with directions The mandate petition is denied. Upon remittitur issuance, the trial court is to issue

an order that is fully compliant with Code of Civil Procedure section 2032.320,

subdivision (d

no Turner
11/14/14 B253059

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Luna CA2/5 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
11/21/13 cr The judgment is modified to include, in connection with the $50 criminal

laboratory analysis fee (Health & Saf. Code, § 11372.5, subd. (a)): a $50 state penalty

(§ 1464, subd. (a)(1)); a $35 county penalty (Gov. Code, § 76000, subd. (a)(1)); a $10

state surcharge (§ 1465.7, subd. (a)); a $25 state court construction penalty (Gov. Code,

§ 70372, subd. (a)(1)); a $5 deoxyribonucleic acid penalty (Gov. Code, § 76104.6, subd.

(a)(1)); a $20 state-only deoxyribonucleic acid penalty (Gov. Code, § 76104.7, subd. (a))

and a $10 emergency medical services penalty (Gov. Code, § 76000.5, subd. (a)(1)). The

judgment is affirmed in all other respects. Upon remittitur issuance, the abstract of

judgment must be amended to include the foregoing penalties and surcharge. The

abstract of judgment must also be amended to reflect a $2,520 restitution fine (Pen. Code,

§ 1202.4, subd. (b)) and a $2,520 parole revocation restitution fine

no Turner
11/14/14 B249671

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Rush CA2/1 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
06/18/13 cr reversed no Chaney
11/14/14 B247593

[PDF] [ DOC]

Hudson v. County of Los Angeles CA2/1 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
03/15/13 civil The judgment against Hudson and in favor of the Department and LACERA is

reversed. The superior court is directed to: (1) vacate its order granting judgment on the

pleadings on the first cause of action of the original pleading by Hudson against the

Department; (2) vacate its order granting judgment on the pleadings on the first and

second causes of action of the first amended complaint; and (3) vacate its order granting

judgment on the pleadings on the third cause of action of the first amended complaint.

no Chaney
11/14/14 A142605

[PDF] [ DOC]

P.A. v. Superior Court CA1/3 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
07/25/14 juvenile writ petition denied no Pollak
11/14/14 G050117

[PDF] [ DOC]

In re M.R. CA4/3 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
05/08/14 juvenile Affirm no Thompson
11/14/14 G050014

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Wade CA4/3 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
04/21/14 cr wende appeal Affirm no O’Leary
11/14/14 E060241

[PDF] [ DOC]

In re R.F. CA4/2 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
12/16/13 juvenile Affirm no Hollenhurst
11/14/14 D062677M

[PDF] [ DOC]

Silvergate Financial v. Asbury CA4/1 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
09/13/12 civil order modifying opinion change in judgment no McConnell
11/14/14 C076492

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Galba CA3 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
04/28/14 cr wende appeal Affirm no Blease
11/14/14 C072123

[PDF] [ DOC]

Griffith v. Pacific Coast Builders CA3 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
09/17/12 civil Affirm yes Butz
11/14/14 C063037A

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Uy CA3 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
09/21/09 cr As to Uy, on the count 1 conviction of murder, we reverse the LWOP sentence

and strike the 10-year gang enhancement imposed pursuant to section 186.22,

subdivision (b)(1). We remand the matter for resentencing consistent with Gutierrez,

supra, 58 Cal.4th 1354, and Miller, supra, 567 U.S. ___ [183 L.Ed.2d 407]. The

judgment is otherwise affirmed as modified. After resentencing, the trial court is directed

to amend the abstract of judgment and to forward a certified copy of the amended

abstract of judgment to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

As to Prum, the convictions on counts 6 and 7 are reversed; the sentences on those

counts are vacated. In addition, the judgment is modified to strike the life sentences

imposed pursuant to section 186.22, subdivision (b)(1) on the convictions for counts 1, 2

and 3, and the 10-year prison term enhancement on the conviction for count 4. The

judgment is further modified to reflect that Prum is sentenced on the count 5 conviction

to a term of 15 years to life in prison.

no Mauro
11/14/14 B254675

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Martinez CA2/8 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
02/27/14 cr The judgment is modified to strike the 15-year-to-life term imposed on count 2

and impose in its place a term of life with the possibility of parole with a 15-year

minimum parole eligibility term in accordance with section 186.22, subdivision (b)(5).

In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed

no Rubin
11/14/14 B251434

[PDF] [ DOC]

Annocki v. Peterson Enterpises CA2/1 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
09/13/13 civil The judgment is reversed. Plaintiffs shall be given an opportunity to amend their

complaint to allege additional facts necessary to establish this duty. Appellants are to recover their costs on appeal

no Johnson
11/14/14 A139264

[PDF] [ DOC]

Purcell-Murray v. Clark Law Group CA1/1 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
07/17/13 civil Affirm no Dondero
11/14/14 G048968

[PDF] [ DOC]

Sidler v. RJT Investment Services CA4/3 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
09/05/13 civil Affirm no Thompson
11/14/14 G048545

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Ruedas CA4/3 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
06/07/13 cr Affirm no Rylaarsdam
11/14/14 F066500

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Farias CA5 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
01/17/13 cr Affirm no Poochigian
11/14/14 F064481

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Carisalas CA5 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
02/17/12 cr The section 186.21 subdivision (b)(1)(C) enhancements imposed on counts 10 and

12 are stricken. The matter is remanded to the trial court for issuance of a corrected

abstract of judgment and a corrected minute order to reflect accurately the restitution

ordered by the trial court. The amended abstract of judgment shall correct the errors we 44.

have identified in counts 8, 10, 11, and 12.

no Cornell
11/14/14 E058142

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Crossno CA4/2 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
02/26/13 cr Defendant’s concurrent, one-year sentence for attempted indecent exposure (count

2) is ordered stayed under section 654. Defendant’s presentence custody credits are

ordered increased from 231 presentence custody credits to 438 days of presentence

custody credits. In all other regards, the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court is directed to correct the abstract of judgment to show that

defendant must register as a sexual offender under section 290, subdivision (c). The

superior court is ordered to issue a modified abstract of judgment reflecting the

sentencing changes ordered by this court and also adding that defendant must register as a

sex offender under section 290, subdivision (c). T

no Codrington
11/14/14 D065047

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Porcadilla CA4/1 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
12/02/13 cr Affirm no McDonald
11/14/14 D064949

[PDF] [ DOC]

Kagewerks, Inc. v. Kalasho CA4/1 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
11/13/13 civil Affirm no Aaron
11/14/14 D064349

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Ferelli CA4/1 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
07/31/13 cr Affirm no Benke
11/14/14 D062857

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Farley CA4/1 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
10/16/12 cr The judgment is affirmed. The matter is remanded to the trial court. On remand,

the trial court is directed to prepare a new abstract of judgment in accordance with part

III.G

no Aaron
11/14/14 C075647

[PDF] [ DOC]

In re J.B. CA3 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
01/15/14 juvenile Affirm no Robie
11/14/14 B254820

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Roemer CA2/5 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
03/05/14 cr Affirm no Kriegler
11/14/14 B254138

[PDF] [ DOC]

In re L.N. CA2/8 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
01/24/14 juvenile Affirm no Grimes
11/14/14 B252969

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Teague CA2/5 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
11/20/13 cr Affirm no Kriegler
11/14/14 B250543

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v Hamilton CA2/5 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
07/31/13 cr Affirm no Kriegler
11/14/14 B248369

[PDF] [ DOC]

Knittel v. Elysian Care Corp. CA2/5 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
04/23/13 civil Affirm no Kriegler
11/14/14 F067523

[PDF] [ DOC]

Gary and Gunland-Gary v. Cal. Dept. of Transportation CA5 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
05/27/10 civil The judgment is affirmed, except appellant’s May 27, 2010, sentence, and July 16,

2010, resentence, are vacated and the matter is remanded for resentencing consistent with this opinion.

The trial court is directed to forward to the Department of Corrections an

amended abstract of judgment

no Kitching
11/14/14 D065946

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Hernandez CA4/1 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
04/23/13 cr Affirm no O’Rourke
11/14/14 D064736

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Grewell CA4/1 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
09/27/13 cr Affirm no McIntyre
11/14/14 D064045

[PDF] [ DOC]

Wu v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. CA4/1 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
06/06/13 civil Affirm no O’Rourke
11/14/14 B251352

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Zuniga CA2/5 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
09/25/13 cr The cause is remanded to the trial court, which shall (1) strike the prior prison

term enhancement in case No. TA115088, (2) determine whether case No. NA082981 or

No. 620845013 is the appropriate prior prison term, and dismiss the alternative

allegation; and (3) either impose or strike the remaining prior prison term allegation.

no Kriegler
11/14/14 B248260

[PDF] [ DOC]

Sternlib v. Story Lending CA2/3 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
04/17/13 civil The damages award is reversed and the matter is remanded for a retrial of the

damages issue. In all other respects the judgment is affirmed.

no Kitching
11/14/14 B247991

[PDF] [ DOC]

Kodama v. Vega CA2/3 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
04/04/13 civil Affirm yes Aldrich
11/14/14 B247910

[PDF] [ DOC]

Sperber v. Regents of the University of Cal. CA2/3 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
03/28/13 civil Affirm no Kitching
11/14/14 B245041

[PDF] [ DOC]

Estate of Gordon CA2/3 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
10/22/12 civil Affirm yes Kitching
11/14/14 B225127B

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Silva CA2/3 filed 11/14/14

Case Details
05/27/10 cr The judgment is affirmed, except appellant’s May 27, 2010, sentence, and July 16,

2010, resentence, are vacated and the matter is remanded for resentencing consistent with

this opinion

no Kitching
11/13/14 H040132

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Angelle CA6 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
09/04/13 cr appeal dismissed as moot no Grover
11/13/14 E059944

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Kramer CA4/2 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
10/30/13 cr The order denying the petition for a certificate of rehabilitation is affirmed. no King
11/13/14 B251574

[PDF] [ DOC]

Krause v. Aurora Loan Services CA2/4 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
09/20/13 civil Affirm summary judgment motion yes Willhite
11/13/14 A137704

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Garcia-Salbalsa CA1/4 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
01/24/13 cr affirm no Ruvolu
11/13/14 A136887M

[PDF] [ DOC]

DEEPmoney v. Pershing CA1/3 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
10/16/12 civil affirm no Jenkins
11/13/14 F067587

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Lewis CA5 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
06/28/13 cr The order denying the petition to recall sentence pursuant to Penal Code

section 1170.126 is reversed and the matter is remanded with directions that Judge

Oakley hear the petition. If Judge Oakley is unavailable, Judge Soldani’s ruling of

June 21, 2013, denying the petition, shall be deemed reinstated.

no Levy
11/13/14 B257869

[PDF] [ DOC]

M. M. v. Super. Ct. CA2/4 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
07/10/14 juvenile writ proceeding The petition is granted. The court’s July 10, 2014 order terminating

reunification services, setting a section 366.26 hearing, and finding that return of

Carter to the physical custody of Mother would create a substantial risk of

detriment to his physical or emotional well-being is reversed, and the hearing

scheduled pursuant to section 366.26 is vacated. The matter is remanded for

further proceedings consistent with the views expressed in this opinion.

no Manella
11/13/14 B256661

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Williamson CA2/2 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
05/22/14 cr wende appeal affirm no Boren
11/13/14 B254692

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Smith CA2/4 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
03/03/14 cr wende appeal affirm no Manella
11/13/14 B254686

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Lugo CA2/5 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
02/28/14 cr affirm no Mosk
11/13/14 B253831

[PDF] [ DOC]

In re C.S. CA2/4 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
01/14/14 juvenile affirm no Collins
11/13/14 B251709

[PDF] [ DOC]

In re A.R. CA2/8 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
09/17/13 juvenile The order denying mother’s section 388 petition is affirmed insofar as it denies

mother’s request for termination of the legal guardianship. It is reversed insofar as it

denies mother’s alternate request for additional reunification services. The matter is

remanded to the juvenile court with instructions that it conduct a new hearing to

decide what additional reunification services are available for mother that will serve

the best interests of A.R., unless current conditions and circumstances convince the

court that further reunification services would not be in the best interests of A.R.

no Rubin
11/13/14 B244946

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Williams CA2/8 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
11/02/12 cr affirm no Rubin
11/13/14 A140739

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Smart CA1/1 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
01/03/14 cr affirm no Margulies
11/13/14 A138045

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Tiller CA1/5 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
02/27/13 cr affirm no Bruiniers
11/13/14 H038786

[PDF] [ DOC]

Wang v. TDS Group CA6 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
10/28/14 civil The August 16, 2014 order granting a new trial on the cause of action for breach

of contract is affirmed. Wang’s appeal from the August 14, 2012 order granting TDS’s

motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the causes of action for intentional

interference with prospective economic relations and intentional interference with

contractual relations is dismissed. The August 14, 2012 order denying TDS’s motion for

judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the breach of contract cause of action is

affirmed. TDS’s protective cross-appeal from the August 16, 2012 order denying TDS’s

motion for new trial on the causes of action for intentional interference with prospective

economic relations and intentional interference with contractual relations is dismissed as

moot. The parties are to bear their own costs on appeal

no BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN
11/13/14 F068056

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Esparza CA5 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
09/17/13 cr affirm no Levy
11/13/14 F067660

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. McKenry CA5 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
07/22/13 cr wende appeal affirm no Gomes
11/13/14 E059240

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Fleming CA4/2 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
07/16/13 cr The judgment is reversed. The Superior Court of San Bernardino County is

directed to specifically enforce the plea agreement. If defendant does not agree to abide

by the probation terms, the court is directed to withdraw its approval of the plea

agreement, pursuant to section 1192.5, and permit defendant to withdraw his guilty plea

and go to trial on the original charge

no Hollenhurst
11/13/14 C075606

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Wilder CA3 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
01/21/14 cr The judgment is modified, reducing conduct credits to 81 days pursuant to

section 2933.1 for a total of 626 days of presentence custody credits. The trial court is

directed to prepare an amended abstract of judgment and to forward a certified copy to

the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. As modified, the judgment is

affirmed.

no Duarte
11/13/14 C074745

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Fletcher CA3 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
08/30/13 cr affirm no Mauro
11/13/14 C070641

[PDF] [ DOC]

Torres v. County of San Joaquin CA3 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
03/20/12 civil affirm no Mauro
11/13/14 B254421

[PDF] [ DOC]

P.v. Josaphat CA2/1 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
02/18/14 cr wende appeal affirm no Chaney
11/13/14 B249225

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. McAlpine CA2/6 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
06/03/13 cr We modify the judgment to reflect that Miles is entitled to a total of

63 days of presentence custody credit, instead of 62. McAlpine’s sentence is

modified to strike one of the two, five-year enhancements as to count 1 and to strike 11

one of the two, five-year enhancements as to count 2. The Superior Court Clerk

shall amend the abstract of the judgment to reflect these modifications and shall

forward an amended copy to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. In

all other respects, the judgment is affirmed

no Burke
11/13/14 B239122A

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Ogura CA2/6 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
02/08/12 cr Ogura’s conviction for first degree murder is reversed and remanded.

The People may choose to accept a reduction to second degree murder or retry Ogura

for first degree murder under the appropriate theory. If the People do not elect within

30 days of the date of the remittiturs to retry Ogura, the offense shall be reduced to

second degree murder. Hernandez’s sentence on count 2, dissuading a witness in

violation of section 136.1, is reduced from a consecutive 15 years to life to a

consecutive 7 years to life; all sentences imposed on Hernandez and Ogura pursuant to

section 186.22, subdivision (b)(1)(C) are stricken; and the restitution fine for each

defendant is reduced from $240 to $200.

no Gilbert
11/13/14 E060979

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Sulit CA4/2 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
04/11/14 cr The trial court’s order denying defendant’s purported motion for relief from sex

offender registration is affirmed.

no McKinster
11/13/14 E056412

[PDF] [ DOC]

Shalikar v. Shalikar CA4/2 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
06/04/12 civil affirm no King
11/13/14 D066144

[PDF] [ DOC]

Julio L. v. Super. Ct. CA4/1 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
06/11/14 juvenile writ petition denied no McDonald
11/13/14 D064673

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Sanchez CA4/1 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
09/16/13 cr affirm no Haller
11/13/14 D064192

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Phelps CA4/1 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
07/02/13 cr affirm no McConnell
11/13/14 C075066

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Caldwell CA3 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
10/30/13 cr The judgment is modified to strike the conviction and stayed sentence on count 2

for possession of a controlled substance for sale. In all other respects, the judgment is

Affirmed

no Mauro
11/13/14 C074848

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Hickman CA3 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
09/18/13 cr affirm no Duarte
11/13/14 C073500

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Farley CA3 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
04/09/13 cr The judgment is modified to strike one section 667.5, subdivision (b) prior prison

term enhancement on count I and count III. As modified, the judgment is affirmed.

no Mauro
11/13/14 B254404

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Jones CA2/1 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
02/13/14 cr wende appeal appeal dismissed t no Miller
11/13/14 B250192

[PDF] [ DOC]

Siegfried v. Pacific Specialty Ins. CA2/4 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
07/22/13 civil The judgment in favor of Cappuccino is affirmed. The judgment in

favor of Pacific Specialty is reversed and the matter remanded for further

proceedings. Cappuccino is entitled to costs on appeal. As to the causes of action

against Pacific Specialty, each party is to bear its own costs on appeal.

no Willhite
11/13/14 H038824

[PDF] [ DOC]

Palacio v. Peck CA6 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
09/25/12 civil harassment restraining order affirm on 4 counts of harassment no Premo
11/13/14 H038391

[PDF] [ DOC]

Durham v. Live Nation Worldwide CA6 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
06/06/12 civil affirm 2 pro per , one represented Premo
11/13/14 E057853

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Bernal CA4/2 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
01/04/13 cr affirm no King
11/13/14 D066116

[PDF] [ DOC]

In re Madison T. CA4/1 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
06/10/14 juvenile affirm no Huffman
11/13/14 D065735

[PDF] [ DOC]

In re I.P. CA4/1 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
04/08/14 juvenile affirm no Huffman
11/13/14 D065639

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Hutchings CA4/1 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
03/12/14 cr wende appeal affirm no Haller
11/13/14 D065356

[PDF] [ DOC]

In re M.Y. CA4/1 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
01/30/14 juvenile affirm no Benke
11/13/14 D063246

[PDF] [ DOC]

Vartelas v. Universal Enterprises Internat. CA4/1 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
02/11/13 civil The judgments are affirmed. Ladckie’s cross-appeal is dismissed as moot.

Vartelas’s motion to dismiss Ladckie’s cross-appeal is denied as moot. Universal, Dublin

Square, and Ladckie are entitled to costs on appeal

no McIntyre
11/13/14 B257555

[PDF] [ DOC]

D.T. v. Super. Ct. CA2/8 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
07/02/14 juvenile writ petition The writ petition is granted. The juvenile court is directed to (1) vacate that

portion of its July 1, 2014 disposition order denying reunification services to mother and

setting a hearing pursuant to section 366.26 for the selection and implementation of a

permanent plan for V.T., and (2) schedule a new date for a contested disposition hearing

concerning V.T.

no Grimes
11/13/14 A133536

[PDF] [ DOC]

Skamangas v. Lai CA1/1 filed 11/13/14

Case Details
10/21/11 civil affirm no Humes
11/12/14 F067909

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Arellano CA5 filed 11/12/14

Case Details
09/06/13 cr reversed no Franson
11/12/14 F067225

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Warne CA5 filed 11/12/14

Case Details
05/03/13 cr affirm no Gomes
11/12/14 F066974

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Gutierrez CA5 filed 11/12/14

Case Details
04/02/13 cr The court’s restitution fine order is vacated and the matter is remanded to the trial

court with directions to exercise its discretion in determining the amount of Gutierrez’s

restitution fine. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.

no Detjen
11/12/14 E058897

[PDF] [ DOC]

Fitton v. Senator CA4/2 filed 11/12/14

Case Details
06/05/13 civil (Fam. Code, § 6200 et seq) affirm yes Miller
11/12/14 E058700

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Ojeda CA4/2 filed 11/12/14

Case Details
05/06/13 cr We direct the superior court clerk to correct the minute order of the sentencing

hearing and the abstract of judgment to reflect that the sentencing court did not impose

3 The plea agreement contains a hand-written notation at the bottom of the first

page referring to the two restitution fines. However, defendant did not initial this

[footnote continued on next page] 7

any restitution fines, and to forward an amended abstract of judgment to the Department

of Corrections and Rehabilitation. I

no Gaut
11/12/14 D065195M

[PDF] [ DOC]

Franklin & Seidelmann v. Chao CA4/1 filed 10/14/14

Case Details
01/03/14 civil order modifying opinion no change in judgment no Benke
11/12/14 G048749

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Delosreyes CA4/3 filed 11/12/14

Case Details
07/25/13 cr affirm no Moore
11/12/14 D066047

[PDF] [ DOC]

In re Alexis A. CA4/1 filed 11/12/14

Case Details
05/27/14 juvenile affirm no Huffman
11/12/14 C075608

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Harmon CA3 filed 11/12/14

Case Details
01/13/14 cr affirm no Robie
11/12/14 C075496

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Hermann CA3 filed 11/12/14

Case Details
01/02/14 cr wende appeal Defendant’s convictions are affirmed. The matter is remanded to the trial court

with directions to enter a disposition as to counts II and IV and the on-bail allegations in

case No. 13NCR09755, to prepare an amended abstract of judgment that sets out that

disposition, and to forward a certified copy of the amended abstract of judgment to the

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

no Blease
11/12/14 C073964

[PDF] [ DOC]

Patkins v. Brown CA3 filed 11/12/14

Case Details
05/20/13 civil appeal dismissed as moot yes Robie
11/12/14 C073617

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Whitmer CA3 filed 11/12/14

Case Details
04/15/13 cr affirm no Robie
11/12/14 B251383

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Martinez CA2/4 filed 11/12/14

Case Details
08/28/13 cr The judgment is reversed for the sole purpose of remanding the matter

to the trial court so that it may sentence defendant on count 2 in accord with the

views expressed herein

no Willhite
11/12/14 B247707

[PDF] [ DOC]

Corrigan v. Kent CA2/6 filed 11/12/14

Case Details
03/19/13 civil affirm no Gilbert
11/12/14 A141641

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Miller CA1/2 filed 11/12/14

Case Details
04/24/14 cr wende appeal affirm no Stewart
11/12/14 A140463

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. James CA1/3 filed 11/7/14

Case Details
11/22/13 cr wende appeal affirm no Pollak
11/12/14 D064969

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Leal CA4/1 filed 11/12/14

Case Details
10/23/13 cr affirm no Huffman
11/12/14 C074443

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Molea CA3 filed 11/12/14

Case Details
08/06/13 cr The judgment is affirmed. The trial court is directed to correct its minutes to

reflect a count 8 sentence pursuant to sections 667, subdivisions (b) through (i), and

1170.12.

no Hull
11/12/14 C073493

[PDF] [ DOC]

In re B.E. CA3 filed 11/12/14

Case Details
04/09/13 juvenile appeal dismissed Hull
11/12/14 C072731

[PDF] [ DOC]

In re L.M. CA3 filed 11/12/14

Case Details
12/04/12 juvenile The orders of the juvenile court are reversed. The trial court is directed to grant

M.W.’s request to be declared L.M.’s presumed parent and dismiss the section 300

petition. Accordingly, the subsequent judgment of disposition is vacated and L.M. is to

be returned to M.W.’s custody. Having served its purpose, the stay of the section 366.26

hearing issued by this court on July 10, 2013, is vacated upon finality of this opinion.

no Hull
11/12/14 B246824

[PDF] [ DOC]

Shkolnik v. CitiMortgage CA2/7 filed 11/12/14

Case Details
01/17/13 civil The order of dismissal is reversed. The matter is remanded to the trial court with

directions to allow Shkolnik the opportunity to respond to the CitiMortgage defendants’

demurrer to the third amended complaint and to set the demurrer for hearing on proper

statutory notice. Shkolnik is entitled to his costs on appeal.

no Woods
11/10/14 G050077

[PDF] [ DOC]

Young v. Taunton CA4/3 filed 11/10/14

Case Details
08/30/12 civil The order is affirmed. As there has been no appearance for Respondent, no

costs will be awarded on appeal.

yes O’Leary
11/10/14 A140974

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Bera CA1/3 filed 11/10/14

Case Details
02/05/14 cr wende appeal Affirm no Siggins
11/10/14 H040269

[PDF] [ DOC]

Hot Spot Investment v. Capitol Investment CA6 filed 11/10/14

Case Details
10/11/13 civil Affirm yes Elia
11/10/14 G048668

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Delgado CA4/3 filed 11/10/14

Case Details
07/01/13 cr Affirm no Bedsworth
11/10/14 D066038

[PDF] [ DOC]

In re Javier D. CA4/1 filed 11/10/14

Case Details
05/22/14 juvenile Affirm no Irion
11/10/14 F066554

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Carroll CA5 filed 11/10/14

Case Details
01/23/13 cr Affirm no Franson
11/10/14 D065342

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Gough CA4/1 filed 11/10/14

Case Details
01/27/14 cr Affirm no McIntyre
11/10/14 B255409

[PDF] [ DOC]

In re Isabelle P. CA2/4 filed 11/10/14

Case Details
02/21/14 juvenile Affirm no Manella
11/10/14 B254023

[PDF] [ DOC]

Pena v. Navarro CA2/7 filed 11/10/14

Case Details
01/16/14 civil Affirm no Perluss
11/10/14 B252431

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Deleon CA2/4 filed 11/10/14

Case Details
10/18/13 cr The judgment of conviction is affirmed. The true finding on the

allegations of four prior serious felony convictions under section 667 is reversed

and the sentence vacated. The case is remanded for a retrial on the prior

conviction allegations if the prosecution so elects. If the prosecution does not elect

to retry the allegations or does not prove the allegations on retrial, the court shall

resentence appellant with only one enhancement.

no Willhite
11/10/14 B251789

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Wilson CA2/7 filed 11/10/14

Case Details
09/11/13 cr The sentence imposed is vacated, and the matter remanded for resentencing

consistent with this opinion.

no Perluss
11/10/14 B251745

[PDF] [ DOC]

Godales v. County of Los Angeles CA2/7 filed 11/10/14

Case Details
09/27/13 civil Affirm no Perluss
11/10/14 B248553

[PDF] [ DOC]

Samara v. Estate of Nahigian CA2/7 filed 11/10/14

Case Details
05/01/13 civil probate Affirm no Perluss
11/10/14 B237636

[PDF] [ DOC]

Mahmud v. Ralphs Grocery Co. CA2/4 filed 11/10/14

Case Details
11/30/11 civil The order denying Ralphs’ petition to compel arbitration is reversed. The

matter is remanded for entry of an order granting the petition. Ralphs is awarded

costs on appeal

no Manella
11/10/14 A139351

[PDF] [ DOC]

In re B.G. CA1/2 filed 11/10/14

Case Details
02/25/13 juvenile delinquent The juvenile court’s commitment order, to the extent that it fails to correctly

calculate B.G.’s pre-commitment custody credit, is reversed; in all other respects, it is

affirmed. The matter is remanded to the juvenile court with directions: (1) to calculate

the amount of pre-commitment custody credit to which B.G. is entitled; (2) to prepare an

amended commitment order reflecting such credit; and (3) to forward a certified copy of

the amended commitment order to the DJJ.

no Stewart
11/10/14 H040968

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Robles CA6 filed 11/10/14

Case Details
04/28/14 cr wende appeal Affirm no Elia
11/10/14 H040627

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Aguilar CA6 filed 11/10/14

Case Details
01/24/14 cr wende appeal Affirm no Elia
11/10/14 F064425A

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Herrera CA5 filed 11/10/14

Case Details
02/22/12 cr Affirm no Hill
11/10/14 C076335

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. McKee CA3 filed 11/10/14

Case Details
04/25/14 cr Affirm no Blease
11/10/14 C075052

[PDF] [ DOC]

P. v. Arevalo CA3 filed 11/10/14

Case Details
10/23/13 cr Affirm no Blease
11/10/14 A140393

[PDF] [ DOC]

Vitushkina v. Luminalt Energy Corp. CA1/4 filed 11/10/14

Case Details
11/27/13 civil Affirm no Rivera
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s