The United States Government needs to hold its employees accountable

Parents and litigants who have experienced the “family court massacre” that calls itself “justice” in the land of the free and the home of the brave; know quite well that those sentiments do not apply to them.

Once a heinous travesty of justice occurs the Court will do its utmost to dehumanize these parents and their children as NOT RELEVANT. We don’t count as it’s just easier to  cover up atrocities than dealing with incorrect rulings. These actions are torture as they result in an aggregate of inhumane mental suffering that no parent nor their children should have to experience.

Litigants know there is no accountability. The Appeal Court protects its judicial brothers and sisters as the concept of law does not exist in this country. The CA Supreme Court refuses to accept family law cases, and thumbs its judicial nose at pro per litigants. The “oversight” bodies such as the Commission on Judicial Performance, the only one who can address a complaint against a judge, conducts its investigations in secret and the complaint against A CALIFORNIA JUDGE(S) goes unheard and disappears underneath the judicial veil.

The US government routinely cites that there is a separation of executive, legislative and judicial function and therefore cannot become involved in these atrocity cases. That is very far from the truth.

Judicial officers are STATE OFFICERS under the government code. They represent the state and the US government as STATE ACTORS/Parties. CA government code § 811. 9 (a) specifies the following:

 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, judges,
subordinate judicial officers, and court executive officers of the
superior courts are state officers for purposes of Part 1 (commencing
with Section 810) to Part 7 (commencing with Section 995),
inclusive, and trial court employees are employees of the trial court
for purposes of Part 1 (commencing with Section 810) to Part 7
(commencing with Section 995), inclusive.

The United National treaties, ratified by the united States, constitute international law and refer to State Parties and their obligations under International law.

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CCPR.aspx

Universal Declaration of Human Rights:
http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/043/88/IMG/NR004388.pdf?OpenElement

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination by its State parties.
http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CERD.aspx

“Considering that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights proclaims that all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights and that everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set out therein, without distinction of any kind, in particular as to race, colour or national origin,

Considering that all human beings are equal before the law and are entitled to equal protection of the law against any discrimination and against any incitement to discrimination”

Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CAT.aspx

The US government can and should hold these people accountable.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s