When dealing with an abusive ex-spouse, litigants are often forced to deal with in-laws who are toxic. Normal people cannot imagine the dimensions and the truly evil thought processes that are invo…
Source: The Toxic Ex In-laws
A comment on the Change.org petition for a forensic audit of Judge Wells and actions in family law reveals that a family member has surfaced to highlight why Judge Wells acts in such a corrupt,misogynistic, horrific manner; supporting the removal of Judge Wells from family law.
The family member, in pain, describes Judge Wells as a con-man and snake and reveals why Judge Wells horrifically batters women in his court of law as Judge Well’s first ex-wife had to flea to escape.
Judge Wells takes out every action against women that resemble certain ex-wives and viciously abuses a court of law to harass moms with non-noticed completely senseless expartes that fail to adhere to any standard of the law.
The trigger words for Judge Wells are “fear that the children will be taken out of state” when said children are still registered in school and have never left the state with their mom in any capacity in violation of any court order. Other trigger words are that SHE CANNOT BE MADE TO COMPLY WITH ANY COURT ORDERS, (resembling the fixation against his ex-wife who failed to comply with a marriage), forcing Judge Wells to act on his compulsion to punish his first ex-wife for leaving him.
Moms are forcibly judicially harassed, viciously retaliated against and tied to Judge Wells’ department 2 J as Judge Wells cannot stand the thought that anyone would want to escape his insanity, including the refusal to adhere to a granted disqualification signed by Judge Wells.
In Judge Wells’ mind there is a statutory exception not found in any code that allows a judge to act after a disqualification although CCP section 170.4 (d) specifies : ”Except as provided in this section, a disqualified judge shall have no power to act in any proceeding after his or her disqualification or after the filing of a statement of disqualification until the question of his or her disqualification has been determined.”
Judge Wells is fixated on fathers and granting their every wish as his own biological children were removed from him.
A judicial officer with this kind of background, including three ex-wives, should never be allowed to go near a family law case.
The petition can be accessed at the following site: https://www.change.org/p/california-state-auditor-forensic-audit-judge-dale-wells-riverside-superior-court
A review published on gavelbangers highlights the fear of concerned fathers and husbands who have to deal with the repercussions of Judge Dale Wells actions in family law. Loving family members have to witness the torture that their wives and daughters are exposed to.
Litigants live in fear of waking up with another non-noticed exparte order, order to show cause or tyrannical ruling that fails to adhere to the law. Litigants live in fear of the absolute anarchy that Department 2 J represents to the court. Litigants live in fear of the absolute lack of accountability that is prevalent in Department 2 J. Judge Wells REFUSES to cease with his harassment and outrageous rulings of target parents while protecting the other parent at all cost, using a court of law to incite domestic violence.
Judge Wells is outraged if a judge issues any orders that deviate from his set path and fabricated pattern in a case that does not adhere to any evidence, testimony or witness testimony presented. The court refuses to take action and place an impartial judge in
family law. Litigants fail to be treated with respect by a court of law. Judge Wells has a one star rating on gavelbangers, Gavelbangers one star rating
The court has taken its vendetta to a new level and is fabricating MC 701 forms specifying that a party has allegedly FILED NEW LITIGATION when this is not the case. The court has inserted THREE forms on the same date rather than addressing a filed restraining order with children which has been pending since October 2015. The Restraining order was filed, the court refuses to address it and the restraining order is listed as active.
Each and every fabrication by this court increases the level of domestic violence as the court is the leading and instrumental factor in increasing the existing level of domestic violence.
The FORMS are blank, do not contain a name and specify that they are COURT GENERATED. In other words not filed by a party and of course do not contain a reference to new litigation in any capacity.
The court refuses to address the fact that the court is fabricating FALSE COURT GENERATED MC 701 forms which are absolutely blank, to create a false record of alleged new filings and denials, merely to increase the domestic violence in this case. The forms originate form JUDGE WELLS’ DEPARTMENT 2 J with instruction to Irene Ruiz, Indio family law clerk to file blank MC 701 forms. These actions are a blatant vindictive retaliation against the affected party as the court refuses to address the existing circumstances in this case. The court specifies that it is FITTING PUNISHMENT to be treated in this manner, increasing the level of domestic violence with fabricated forms rather than addressing the domestic violence in this case.
Republished from the Chieftain: Opinion of retired judge Hon. Judge Victor Reyes. Stop hitting, stop threatening, stop raping, stop beating, stop following, stop demanding, stop feeling entitled, s…
Source: Retired Judge calls on abuse to stop
Department 2J has orders not to set any matters before Judge Sterling, even though Judge Sterling has issued a number of orders in family law during his tenure in Department 2 J. Judge Wells has a well known hatred of Judge Sterling and refuses to set any request for orders that are required to be addressed by the original judge (i.e. when a reconsideration is filed) or allow Judge Sterling to address orders issued by Judge Sterling based on his OSC re Contempt approved for filing or address violations of a restraining order issued by Judge Sterling.
A number of denials for hearings before Judge Sterling are reflected in diverse minute orders and transcripts by various parties and attorneys. Judge Wells truly believes that it is acceptable to contaminate the entire court with his disparaging remarks of judges in public proceedings before attorneys and litigants. Judge Wells did the same with a retired judge, Judge Norton. In this instance the denial was actually placed in a minuter order highlighting the bias and prejudice.
The judicial canon of ethics specify that a judge is to promote public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary and the judicial process. Highlighting the hatred and disparaging remarks against other judges in a court of law demeans the judicial office. Judge Wells is incapable of allowing Judge Sterling to address the orders issued by Judge Sterling in Department 2J.
The pubic, through the gavel bangers site, has expressed the fear and terror of being exposed to the monstrosity of Judge Wells’ department 2J.
Parties live in substantial terror of being exposed to Judge Wells in a court of law, when the court has a DUTY to serve the public, adhering to an equal protection of the law standard under the 14th amendment and the 1st amendment right to governmental redress. Instead Judge Wells delights in causing fear; abusing a court of law for his own personal vendetta against parties, attorneys and judges.
Please sign and share to end the unholy reign of terror in Department 2 J, listing your own experiences, with the corresponding petition for forensic audit.
In the mind set of the Riverside Superior court judiciary we exist. We are characterized by definition as “an immoral woman who deceives people in order to get what she wants”. There ar…
Source: The Jezebels of the Riverside Superior Court.
A case in the Riverside Superior court mirrors and expresses the vindictiveness of the Riverside Superior court judiciary against women. In this instance the Riverside Superior court is being used as a platform to “prevail” against a party when the party had little success in another court, the Orange County Superior Court. Continue reading
The Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) was created by the Political Reform Act of 1974 (Act), a ballot initiative passed by California voters in 1974 as Proposition 9. The FDPPC has entered…
Source: Statement of Economic Interests Judge Dale Wells
I am an alienator. You know me well. You lived with me once and you witnessed my behavior patterns but you did not spend time studying and internalizing them. I know your behavior patterns better than you know them yourself. I know how to measure you, test you and control you. I know what your hooks are and I know that the depth of the love for your children is a weakness I can exploit. I am an emotional terrorist. I will terrify you into submission. You will do as I tell you to do, if you do not, I will take your children away. Continue reading
The “honorable” Judge Mark Cope is using an outrageous coercive control technique to get litigants and attorneys to comply with OSCs set by Judge Cope, who obviously has no other issues to address in court hearings. Continue reading
Judge Harold Hopp’s personal vendetta against a litigant in the Riverside Superior Court has outlined the outrageous and malicious nature of the Presiding Judge and his sentiments to domestic violence. October is Domestic Violence awareness month and the Presiding Judge in previous hearings had made it clear that Judge Harold Hopp does not consider restraining orders as domestic violence or abuse and influences the entire court with his outrageous sentiment in violation of all prevailing law. Continue reading
California Commission on Judicial Performance
Commission on Judicial Performance
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 14400
San Francisco, CA 94102
Fax: (415) 557-1266 Continue reading
Several studies have documented the correlation between child abuse and future juvenile delinquency. Children who have experienced abuse are nine times more likely to become involved in criminal activities (Gold, Wolan Sullivan, & Lewis, 2011. The relation between abuse and violent delinquency: The conversion of shame to blame in juvenile offenders. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35(7), 459–467.) Continue reading